Analgesic effect of intravenous anesthesia induction combined anterior lumbar quadratus block and related hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy via retroperitoneal approach / 中华全科医师杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective:To investigate the analgesic effect of intravenous anesthesia induction combined with anterior quadratus lumborum block (AQLB)and related hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing laparoscopic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy (RPN).Methods:A total of 116 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in Jinhua Central Hospital from August 2021 to February 2022 were randomly divided into two groups with 58 cases in each group. Patients in control group received intravenous anesthesia , while those in study group received intravenous anesthesia induction with AQLB. The analgesic effect was evaluated at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after the operation. The hemodynamics were monitored at the time of entering the operating room (T 0), 3 min after induction of anesthesia (T 1), at the beginning of the operation (T 2), after the operation (T 3), and leaving the operating room (T 4). Microcirculation was assessed at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after operation. Cognitive function was assessed 30min before anesthesia, 6 h, 24 h, and 72 h after operation. Results:At 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after operation, the visual analogue scale (VAS) of the resting (quiet state) pain in the study group were 3.2±1.2, 2.6±0.3,2.0±0.4, 1.5±0.4 and 0.8±0.2, which were significantly lower than those in control group (4.0±1.7, 3.4±0.7, 2.9±0.5, 1.7±0.5 and 1.2±0.3) ( t=2.93, P=0.004; t=8.00, P<0.001; t=10.07, P<0.001; t=2.38, P=0.019; t=8.45, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP) at T 0 between two groups ; no significant difference in the heart rate at T 1, T 2, T 3 and T 4. There were significant differences in MAP levels at T 1, T 2, T 3 and T 4 between study group [(80.0±8.0)mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), (84.4±8.4)mmHg, (80.4±5.7)mmHg, (86.4±4.7)mmHg and control group (77.1±7.5)mmHg, (88.0±8.6)mmHg, (83.0±7.7)mmHg, (92.2±6.2) mmHg; t=2.01, P=0.046; t=2.28, P=0.024; t=2.07, P=0.041; t=5.68, P<0.001]. At 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after operation, the morphological scores of tube loops in the study group were 1.0±0.2, 0.8±0.2, 0.7±0.1 and 0.7±0.1, which were lower than those in the control group (1.1 ±0.2, 0.9±0.2, 0.8±0.2 and 0.8±0.1; t=2.69, P=0.008; t=2.69, P=0.008; t=3.41, P=0.001; t=5.39 , P < 0.001). The blood flow status scores of the study group were 1.1±0.2, 0.9±0.2, 0.8±0.2 and 0.6±0.1, which were lower than those of the control group (1.2±0.2, 1.0±0.2, 0.9±0.2 and 0.7±0.1; t=2.69, P=0.008; t=2.69, P=0.008; t=2.69, P=0.008; t=5.39, P<0.001). The cognitive function scores of the study group and the control group were 24.4±1.0, 27.1±0.9 and 23.5±0.9, 26.7±0.9 at 6 h and 24 h after operation ( t=5.10, P<0.001; t=2.39, P=0.018); while there were no significant at 72 h after operation between two groups (28.2±0.9 vs. 28.1±0.8, t=0.63, P=0.529). Conclusion:Intravenous anesthesia induction combined with anterior quadratus lumborum block has a good analgesic effect in patients undergoing RPN, with stable hemodynamics and microcirculation, and not affecting cognitive function of patients.