Prospective Comparison between the Anterior Interbody Fusion and the Posterolateral Fusion / 대한척추외과학회지
Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery
;
: 379-385, 2000.
Article
in Korean
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-96015
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES:
To campare the differences of clinical and radiological results between the posterolateral fusion and the anterior interbody fusion. MATERIALS ANDMETHOD:
For prospective study, the anterior interbody fusion was performed in 20 patients(Group I) and the pos-terolateral fusion was performed in 20 patients(Group II). The operation time, pre- & post-operative hemodynamic changes, functional recovery and fusion rate were compared.RESULTS:
The average operation time was 180 min in group I and 100 min in group II. The average estimated blood loss and transfusion amount were assessed 1225cc, 926cc in group I and 1034cc, 880cc in group II. Clinical results were as follows excellent 25%, good 65%, fair 10% in group I and excellent 15%, good 50%, fair 30%, poor 5% in group II. The fusion rate was 100% in group I and 75% in group II.CONCLUSION:
The anterior interbody fusion with posterior instrumentation is considered encouraging operative methods.
Full text:
Available
Index:
WPRIM (Western Pacific)
Main subject:
Spine
/
Prospective Studies
/
Hemodynamics
Type of study:
Observational study
Language:
Korean
Journal:
Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery
Year:
2000
Type:
Article
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS