A comparison of PCR and LAMP methods for detecting shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli / Монголын Анагаах Ухаан

ABSTRACT

Introduction@#PCR to detect and amplificate the virulence genes of STEC is specific and more sensitive, however, it takes five to six hours for whole test procedure and requires special lab instruments such as thermocycler. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification is a simple, rapid, specific and cost-effective nucleic acid amplification method by using four to six primers when compared to PCR, nucleic acid sequence-based amplification, self-sustained sequence replication and strand displacement amplification.@*Materials and Methods@#In our study, we analyzed comparison of PCR and LAMP results on standard strain used quality control strain solution which diluted 1pg/µL DNA, 10 pg/µL DNA, 100 pg/µL DNA, 1 ng/μL DNA, 10 ng/μL DNA, and 100 ng/μL DNA concentration from LB agar cultures. @*Research ethics@#Permission to submit the survey was granted by the Ethics Review Committee of the MNUMS and the survey was conducted in accordance with the rules and regulations. @*Goal@#Detection and comparison of STEC by PCR and LAMP@*Result@#Sensitivity of Stx1 and stx2 genes in PCR results are positive in 10 pg/µL DNA solution and negative in 1pg/µL DNA. In LAMP test results showed that positive for all concentration. It shows that LAMP method sensitivity is 10 times more than PCR. @*Conclusion@#It shows that LAMP method sensitivity is 10 times more than PCR. All in allLAMP test is cost effective test with sensitive for detection STEC.