Clinical effect analysis of en-bloc low-power holmium laser enucleation of prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia / 国际外科学杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective:To investigate the efficacy and safety of en-bloc low-power (22.5 W) holmium laser for enucleation of prostate (LP-HoLEP) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).Methods:The clinical data of 98 patients with BPH who underwent surgical treatment in the Department of Urology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 2020 to October 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into LP-HoLEP group ( n=53) and TURP group ( n=45) according to different treatment methods. Patients in the LP-HoLEP group were treated with en-bloc holmium laser enucleation of prostate, and patients in the TURP group were treated with transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). Perioperative indexes of the two groups were compared, including operation time, postoperative hemoglobin changes, tissue resection amount, postoperative catheter indentation time, postoperative hospital stay, complications, and international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (Qol) score, maximum urine flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual volume (PVR) and other indicators were obtained at 3 and 6 months after surgery. The measurement data were tested by Shapiro-Wilk normality test. The measurement data conforming to normal distribution were expressed as mean ± standard deviation ( ± s), independent sample t-test was used for comparison between groups, measurement data of skewness distribution were expressed as median (interquartile distance)[ M( Q1, Q3)], and Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison between groups. The Chi-square test was used to compare the count data between groups. Results:In the LP-HoLEP group, the operative time was (65.74±22.82) min, the hemoglobin decreased 5.71(3.97, 9.01) g/L, the tissue resection volume was (60.59±24.40) g, and the catheter indinduration time was (3.03±0.91) d. The length of postoperative hospitalization was (4.14±1.05) d. TURP group was (77.04±27.33) min, 11.02(8.89, 16.51) g/L, (39.49±11.32) g, (4.80±0.91) d, (5.98±1.03) d, respectively. All the indexes of LP-HoLEP group were better than TURP group. The differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05). Compared with preoperative, IPSS, Qol score, Qmax and PVR of two groups were significantly improved at 3 months after surgery, but there were no statistical significance between groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion:En-bloc LP-HoLEP is safe and reliable in the treatment of BPH, and has advantages over TURP in terms of tissue resection volume, shortening hospitalization and indwelling catheter time, and reducing intraoperative bleeding.