Short-term effect of HeartCon left ventricular assist device on the treatment of 20 adult patients with end-stage heart failure / 中华危重病急救医学

ABSTRACT

Objective:To investigate and evaluate the efficacy of HeartCon left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in the treatment of adult patients with end-stage heart failure (ESHF).Methods:A prospective and observational study was conducted. Patients with ESHF who underwent LVAD implantation in the department of cardiac surgery of Teda International Cardiovascular Hospital from September 2020 to August 2021 were selected. The left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and six minute walk distance (6MWD) before operation and 90 days after operation were compared. The incidence of equipment failures and major adverse events within 90 days after operation were recorded.Results:A total of 20 patients with ESHF were included, with 15 males and 5 females. Patients' age ranged from 20 to 67 years old, with an average of (50.2±13.6) years old. The range of body weight was 49.8-106.1 kg, with an average of (67.9±15.5) kg, and the body surface area (BSA) was from 1.49 to 2.32 m 2, with an average of (17.6±0.22) m 2. The operation process of all the patients were successful. The length of hospital stay ranged from 33 to 90 days, and the average was 56.0 (42.8, 75.0) days. Complications within 90 days after operation as follows, 2 cases with pericardial tamponade (10%), 1 case with cerebral hemorrhage (5%), 1 case with mediastinum infection (5%), 3 cases with acute renal injury (AKI, 15%), 5 cases with gastrointestinal bleeding (25%). There were no mechanical failure of LVAD and hemolysis events, right ventricular failure (RVF), cerebral infarction and death occurred. Compared with preoperative, the LVEDD significantly decreased (mm 67.50±13.98 vs. 77.40±9.73), LVEF significantly increased (% 34.80±9.76 vs. 22.70±5.62), NT-proBNP significantly decreased (ng/L 2 028.65±1 752.05 vs. 4 796.45±4 355.40), 6MWD significantly increased (m 385.20±144.12 vs. 85.81±63.50) at 90 days after operation, and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). 18 cases (90%) of the 20 patients reached NYHA classification Ⅰ and 2 cases (10%) reached NYHA classification Ⅱ, which were significantly improved compared with those before surgery (all patients' NYHA classification were Ⅳ before surgery). Conclusion:HeartCon LVAD can effectively improve the life quality of patients with ESHF, which has been proved safe and effective in clinical trials, but its long-term effects and complications need further observation and study.