Significance of Sonoclot analysis for severity monitoring and evaluating perioperative liver transplantation recipients / 中华器官移植杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective:To explore the significance of coagulation and platelet function analysis (Sonoclot) in monitoring coagulation function, severity evaluation and blood transfusion indication of perioperative liver transplant (LT) recipients.Methods:A total of 95 perioperative LT recipients received Sonoclot, thromboelastography (TEG), routine coagulation panel, liver function panel, blood routine, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) scoring and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scoring between January 2021 and October 2022.The correlation analysis of the above parameters was performed.According to the scores of APACHE Ⅱ and MELD, they were assigned into three groups of low-risk, medium-risk and high-risk.The levels of Sonoclot parameters in each group were compared.They were divided into two groups of transfusion (n=31) and non-transfusion (n=64) according to the necessity or non-necessity of transfusion..The risk factors for blood transfusion were examined by Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Results:Pearson's correlation analysis indicated that activated clotting time (ACT) value was correlated positively with the levels of prothrombin time (PT), prothrombin time ratio (PTR), international standard ratio (INR), R/K value, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH)( r=0.279 1, P=0.006 2; r=0.280 2, P=0.006 5; r=0.3, P=0.003 5; r=0.642 8, P<0.000 1; r=0.452 8, P<0.000 1; r=0.377 6, P=0.002; r=0.349 6, P=0.000 6; r=0.271 4, P=0.018 3) and yet negatively with the levels of platelet (PLT), MA, CI and α ( r=-0.339 1, P=0.000 8; r=-0.573 3, P<0.000 1; r=-0.656 3, P<0.000 1; r=-0.632 6, P<0.000 1); CR value was correlated positively with the levels of maximal amplitude (MA), coagulation index (CI), α and ALT ( r=0.466 8, P=0.000 6; r=0.482 7, P=0.000 4; r=0.514 8, P=0.000 1; r=0.229 2, P=0.027 1) and yet negatively with the level of R/K value ( r=-0.366 9, P=0.010 3; r=-0.356 9, P=0.011 0); platelet function (PF) value was correlated positively with the levels of PLT, MA, CI, α and alkaline phosphatase (ALP)( r=0.481 9, P<0.000 1; r=0.630 7, P<0.000 1; r=0.623 5, P<0.000 1; r=0.593 0, P<0.000 1; r=0.223 1, P=0.032 5) and yet negatively with the level of R/K value ( r=-0.421 5, P=0.002 8; r=-0.530 7, P<0.000 1). CR value was correlated negatively with APACHE Ⅱ score ( r=-0.212 3, P=0.038 9) while ACT value was correlated positively with MELD score ( r=0.244, P=0.04). ACT values spiked in low, middle and high-risk groups of APACHE Ⅱ and MELD scores while PF value declined gradually by grouping these recipients based upon scoring systems.CR values decreased merely in MELD score.Logistic regression analysis indicated that ACT was a risk factor for necessity of blood transfusion in perioperative LT recipients ( OR=1.010, 95% CI 1.000-1.019, P<0.05). The maximal area under the curve of ROC curve analysis plus ACT, hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Hct) was 0.896. Conclusions:Sonoclot parameters of perioperative LT recipients have some certain correlation with thromboelastographic and conventional coagulation parameters.Both may serve as a supplementary means.Associated with liver function parameters and liver scores, Sonoclot parameters are significant for early clinical evaluations.Sonoclot parameters plus Hb/Hct detection have some guiding significance for perioperative LT recipients with necessity for blood transfusion and blood products.