Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mandibular single-implant overdenture as an alternative for full arch rehabilitations: a literature review
Câmara-Souza, Mariana Barbosa; Figueredo, Olívia Maria Costa de; Amaral, Camilla Fraga do; Carletti, Talita Malini; Rodrigues-Garcia, Renata Cunha Matheus.
Afiliación
  • Câmara-Souza, Mariana Barbosa; University of Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Piracicaba. BR
  • Figueredo, Olívia Maria Costa de; University of Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Piracicaba. BR
  • Amaral, Camilla Fraga do; University of Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Piracicaba. BR
  • Carletti, Talita Malini; University of Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Piracicaba. BR
  • Rodrigues-Garcia, Renata Cunha Matheus; University of Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology. Piracicaba. BR
Braz. j. oral sci ; 18: e191469, jan.-dez. 2019. ilus
Article en En | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1087866
Biblioteca responsable: BR218.1
ABSTRACT
Oral rehabilitation with mandibular single-implant overdentures (SIO) has been characterized as a solution to improve retention and stability of conventional complete dentures (CD). Among the benefits of this therapy, it can be mentioned minimally invasive surgery, simple prosthetic technique, better retention, and significantly reduced costs. However, the application of this protocol in daily clinic is still not widespread.

Aim:

Thus, this study aimed to perform a literature review to address the clinical characteristics of this rehabilitation, when compared to two-implant mandibular overdentures and CD.

Methods:

For this, a search was conducted in the PubMed database, considering articles published in English language, without date limitation.

Results:

It was found 243 manuscripts, of which 20 were compatible with the aim of this study after title/abstract reading. The selected papers focused on masticatory muscles function, satisfaction levels and self-reported quality of life, as well as surgical and prosthetic outcomes, such as maintenance, repair and implant failure rates. All evaluated manuscripts showed similar masticatory function and patient's satisfaction with SIO and two-implant overdenture, while results for a SIO were greater when compared to rehabilitations with CD. In addition, SIO have proven to do not damage the implant, being implant loss close to zero. However, the prosthesis fracture adjacent to the implant was a recurrent clinical outcome, which requires further studies to solve this impairment.

Conclusion:

Thus, it can be concluded that SIO represents an alternative treatment for frail elders or low-income patients, leading to higher masticatory function, as well as improved quality of life
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Índice: LILACS Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Implantes Dentales / Dentadura Completa / Masticación / Rehabilitación Bucal Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Braz. j. oral sci Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Índice: LILACS Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Implantes Dentales / Dentadura Completa / Masticación / Rehabilitación Bucal Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Braz. j. oral sci Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article