Como interpretar una revisión sistemática con comparaciones múltiples o network metaanálisis / How to interpret systematic reviews with multiple comparisons or network meta-analysis
Rev. méd. Chile
;
148(1): 109-117, Jan. 2020. tab, graf
Artículo
en Español
| LILACS
| ID: biblio-1094213
ABSTRACT
Systematic reviews evaluating multiple interventions can be useful in different clinical situations. However, some concerns arise when more than two interventions are compared and there is a paucity of good quality randomized clinical trials. A novel statistical method based on indirect comparisons, called network meta-analysis (NMA), can be a useful approach to find a clinical answer when multiple interventions are evaluated for the same outcome or comparator. The aim of this review is to describe the main characteristics and provide a user guide for a critical analysis of NMA focusing on its three main domains, namely homogeneity, transitivity and consistency.
Texto completo:
Disponible
Índice:
LILACS (Américas)
Asunto principal:
Metaanálisis en Red
Tipo de estudio:
Ensayo Clínico Controlado
/
Revisiones Sistemáticas Evaluadas
Idioma:
Español
Revista:
Rev. méd. Chile
Asunto de la revista:
Medicina
Año:
2020
Tipo del documento:
Artículo
País de afiliación:
Chile
/
Estados Unidos
Institución/País de afiliación:
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/US
/
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Mayo Clinic/US
/
Massachusetts General Hospital/US
/
Universidad de Concepcion/CL
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS