Criteria for evaluating studies at scientific medical events
Mastology (Online)
;
30: 1-7, 2020.
Artículo
en Inglés
|
LILACS-Express
| LILACS
| ID: biblio-1121088
ABSTRACT
Medical journals value the quality of studies. Scientific events are spaces for discussion in the face of scientific advances, innovation and consensus. In them, space is opened for the presentation of clinical studies, translational studies, experience reports and videos, with the best-designed studies being selected and awarded. The lack of clear criteria allows for differences in assessments, making it difficult to place value on situations associated with research. In order to improve quality, it is necessary to evaluate ethics, the hierarchy of scientific evidence (methodology), the study design, the originality, the relevance, and the linearity of the material presented. The present study aims to discuss these points, presenting proposals to be used in the evaluation of clinical studies, translational studies, case reports and videos in scientific medical events.
Texto completo:
Disponible
Índice:
LILACS (Américas)
Idioma:
Inglés
Revista:
Mastology (Online)
Asunto de la revista:
Neoplasias da Mama
Año:
2020
Tipo del documento:
Artículo
País de afiliación:
Brasil
Institución/País de afiliación:
Hospital de Câncer de Barretos Barretos (SP), Brazil/BR
/
Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo (SP), Brazil/BR
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS