Comparison of two endoscopic spine surgical techniques
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992, Impr.)
;
67(2): 243-247, Feb. 2021. graf
Artículo
en Inglés
| LILACS
| ID: biblio-1287825
ABSTRACT
SUMMARY OBJECTIVE:
The objective of this study is to compare the clinical outcome among patients who are surgically treated for lumbar disc herniation by transforaminal and interlaminar endoscopy techniques.METHODS:
For the treatment of lumbar disc herniation, 31 patients were assigned to undergo the interlaminar technique and 24 patients the transforaminal technique. They were evaluated using visual analog scale and Oswestry disability index in the preoperative period, in the first postoperative period, and in the 12th month after the procedure. The clinical results between the two techniques were then compared.RESULTS:
Overall, 89.1% of the patients obtained good results, with 12.5% complications in the transforaminal technique and 9.6% in the interlaminar technique.CONCLUSION:
Although both the endoscopic techniques, compared in this study, are safe and effective for the surgical treatment of lumbar herniated disc, the interlaminar technique presented significantly better results and lower rates of complications than the transforaminal technique.
Texto completo:
Disponible
Índice:
LILACS (Américas)
Asunto principal:
Discectomía Percutánea
/
Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral
Tipo de estudio:
Estudio observacional
Límite:
Humanos
Idioma:
Inglés
Revista:
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992, Impr.)
Asunto de la revista:
EducaÆo em Sa£de
/
GestÆo do Conhecimento para a Pesquisa em Sa£de
/
Medicina
Año:
2021
Tipo del documento:
Artículo
País de afiliación:
Brasil
Institución/País de afiliación:
Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade/BR
/
Hospital do Trabalhador/BR
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS