Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative application of biological and ninhydrin- derivatized spectrophotometric assays in the evaluation and validation of amikacin sulfate injection
Vaikosen, Edebi Nicholas; Origbo, Samuel Ogheneruona; Ere, Diepreye; Odaderia, Prosper.
  • Vaikosen, Edebi Nicholas; Niger Delta University. Faculty of Pharmacy. Department of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry. Wilberforce Island. NG
  • Origbo, Samuel Ogheneruona; Niger Delta University. Faculty of Pharmacy. Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Biotechnology. Wilberforce Island. NG
  • Ere, Diepreye; Niger Delta University. Faculty of Pharmacy. Department of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry. Wilberforce Island. NG
  • Odaderia, Prosper; Niger Delta University. Faculty of Pharmacy. Department of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry. Wilberforce Island. NG
Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. (Online) ; 58: e201185, 2022. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1420492
ABSTRACT
Abstract Instrumental techniques are preferred over bioassay methods for antibiotic quantification mainly due to speed and ability to quantify metabolites in biological samples; however, the potency and biological activity of these drugs cannot be assessed. Two methods - agar well diffusion (bio-assay) and spectrophotometric methods were used to evaluate amikacin sulfate injection. Agar plates were inoculated with S. aureus inoculum; zones of inhibition from its susceptibility to amikacin were obtained, while spectrophotometric absorption at 650 nm of ninhydrin- derivatized amikacin in phosphate buffer (pH 8) was measured. Methods performance showed linearity from 1 - 16 µgmL-1 (bioassay, r = 0.9994) and 10-50 µgmL-1 (spectrophotometric, r = 0.9998). Molar absorptivity was 2.595 x 104 Lmol-1cm-1. Limits of detection and quantification were 1.07 and 3.24 µgmL-1 respectively for bioassay method, while corresponding values for spectrophotometric method were 0.98 and 2.97 µg mL-1. Relative standard deviations were ≤ 2.0% for both methods, with recoveries from 95.93 - 100.25%. Amikacin in brands ranged from 97.53 ± 2.68 to 100.84 ± 1.82%, student's t-test was ≤ 2.78 (n = 4) with respect to label claim for both methods. Experimental paired t-test (t = 2.07; n = 4) and F-test (F = 3.94; n = 4) values indicated no significant difference between both methods, hence comparable and can jointly be used in quality control assessment of antibiotics
Asunto(s)


Texto completo: Disponible Índice: LILACS (Américas) Asunto principal: Inyecciones Idioma: Inglés Revista: Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. (Online) Asunto de la revista: Farmacologia / Terapˆutica / Toxicologia Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Nigeria Institución/País de afiliación: Niger Delta University/NG

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Índice: LILACS (Américas) Asunto principal: Inyecciones Idioma: Inglés Revista: Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. (Online) Asunto de la revista: Farmacologia / Terapˆutica / Toxicologia Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Nigeria Institución/País de afiliación: Niger Delta University/NG