Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prevalence of permanent numeric dental anomalies in panoramic radiography in an Iranian population
Shokri, Abbas; Bakhshaei, Anahita; Tapak, Leili; Shokouhi, Parisa.
  • Shokri, Abbas; Hamadan University of Medical Sciences. School of Dentistry. Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental Implants Research Center. Hamadan. IR
  • Bakhshaei, Anahita; Hamadan University of Medical Sciences. School of Dentistry. Hamadan. IR
  • Tapak, Leili; Hamadan University of Medical Sciences. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health. Hamadan. IR
  • Shokouhi, Parisa; Hamadan University of Medical Sciences. School of Dentistry. Hamadan. IR
Braz. j. oral sci ; 22: e237699, Jan.-Dec. 2023. ilus
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1437668
ABSTRACT

Aim:

Dental number anomalies are a group of congenital developmental disorders divided into two groups supernumerary and missing teeth. This study was conducted to investigate the prevalence of numeric dental anomalies using panoramic images in patients referred to the Hamadan Dental Faculty.

Methods:

In this cross-sectional study, 2,197 panoramic radiographs of patients aged 6-49 years were evaluated. These anomalies are divided into two groups 1) Supernumerary teeth, including Mesiodens, Distodens, and Peridens, and 2) Missing teeth, including Hypodontia, Oligodontia, and Anodontia. A Chi-square test was performed to assess the relationship between the anomalies. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 16, in which P-value < 0.05 was considered the statistical significance level.

Results:

Of 736 males (32.2%) and 1548 females (67.8%) in this study, 32 (4.3%) and 55 cases (3.8%) had supernumerary teeth, respectively. The prevalence of supernumerary teeth was 0.3%, 0.5%, and 0.6% in males and 0.2%, 1% and 1.2% in females for mesiodens, distodens, and peridens, respectively. Also, 243 males (10.6%) and 655 females (28.6%) had missing teeth anomalies. Hypodontia in the maxilla was the most common anomaly in both genders, while mesiodens was the least common.

Conclusion:

Hypodontia was the most common anomaly, followed by peridens; the least common anomaly was mesiodens. The prevalence of supernumerary teeth was greater in males, though the difference was not statistically significant. In comparison, females had a greater prevalence of missing teeth

Asunto(s)


Texto completo: Disponible Índice: LILACS (Américas) Asunto principal: Anomalías Dentarias / Radiografía Panorámica / Anodoncia Tipo de estudio: Estudio observacional / Estudio de prevalencia / Factores de riesgo Límite: Adolescente / Adulto / Niño / Femenino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglés Revista: Braz. j. oral sci Asunto de la revista: Odontología Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Irán Institución/País de afiliación: Hamadan University of Medical Sciences/IR

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Índice: LILACS (Américas) Asunto principal: Anomalías Dentarias / Radiografía Panorámica / Anodoncia Tipo de estudio: Estudio observacional / Estudio de prevalencia / Factores de riesgo Límite: Adolescente / Adulto / Niño / Femenino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglés Revista: Braz. j. oral sci Asunto de la revista: Odontología Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Irán Institución/País de afiliación: Hamadan University of Medical Sciences/IR