Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation and clinical application of the Metacognitions Questionnaire in a sample of Brazilian generalized anxiety disorder patients: the effects of different treatment interventions
Schwinn, Julia Karl; Giusti Alves, Sofia; Costa, Marianna de Abreu; Gonçalves, Francine; Dreher, Carolina Blaya; Manfro, Gisele Gus.
  • Schwinn, Julia Karl; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. Porto Alegre. BR
  • Giusti Alves, Sofia; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. Porto Alegre. BR
  • Costa, Marianna de Abreu; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. Porto Alegre. BR
  • Gonçalves, Francine; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. Porto Alegre. BR
  • Dreher, Carolina Blaya; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. Porto Alegre. BR
  • Manfro, Gisele Gus; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. Porto Alegre. BR
Trends psychiatry psychother. (Impr.) ; 45: e20210444, 2023. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1509227
ABSTRACT
Abstract Introduction Metacognitive beliefs about worry may trigger anxiety. However, the effect of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) treatment on metacognition has not yet been investigated. Objectives To validate the Metacognitions Questionnaire (MCQ-30) in a Brazilian GAD sample and verify whether different interventions reduce metacognitive beliefs. Method We recruited 180 GAD individuals and randomized them to Body in Mind Training (BMT), Fluoxetine (FLX), or an active control group (Quality of Life [QoL]) for 8 weeks. The MCQ-30 was assessed for internal consistency, was evaluated with confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses, and was tested for convergent validity with the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ). Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were employed to analyze differences after the interventions. Results The MCQ-30 demonstrated good internal consistency and acceptability; the original five-factor model was supported. There was a positive moderate correlation between MCQ-30 scores and worry. GEE showed a significant group x time interaction (p < 0.001). Both BMT (mean difference [MD] = -6.04, standard error [SE] = -2.39, p = 0.034) and FLX (MD = -5.78, SE = 1.91, p = 0.007) reduced MCQ-30 scores. FLX was superior to QoL, but not BMT, at weeks 5 and 8. There were no differences between BMT and QoL. Conclusion The Brazilian-Portuguese version of MCQ-30 showed good psychometric properties. Furthermore, the positive effect of FLX and BMT on metacognition suggests it may represent a potential therapeutic target.


Texto completo: Disponible Índice: LILACS (Américas) Tipo de estudio: Ensayo Clínico Controlado / Estudio pronóstico País/Región como asunto: America del Sur / Brasil Idioma: Inglés Revista: Trends psychiatry psychother. (Impr.) Asunto de la revista: Psiquiatria Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Artículo / Documento de proyecto País de afiliación: Brasil Institución/País de afiliación: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul/BR

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Índice: LILACS (Américas) Tipo de estudio: Ensayo Clínico Controlado / Estudio pronóstico País/Región como asunto: America del Sur / Brasil Idioma: Inglés Revista: Trends psychiatry psychother. (Impr.) Asunto de la revista: Psiquiatria Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Artículo / Documento de proyecto País de afiliación: Brasil Institución/País de afiliación: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul/BR