Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of self-perception of mechanical ventilation knowledge among Brazilian final-year medical students, residents and emergency physicians
Tallo, Fernando Sabia; de Campos Vieira Abib, Simone; de Andrade Negri, Alexandre Jorgi; Cesar Filho, Paulo; Lopes, Renato Delascio; Lopes, Antônio Carlos.
  • Tallo, Fernando Sabia; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Departamento de Cirurgia. São Paulo. BR
  • de Campos Vieira Abib, Simone; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Departamento de Cirurgia. São Paulo. BR
  • de Andrade Negri, Alexandre Jorgi; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Departamento de Cirurgia. São Paulo. BR
  • Cesar Filho, Paulo; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Departamento de Cirurgia. São Paulo. BR
  • Lopes, Renato Delascio; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Departamento de Cirurgia. São Paulo. BR
  • Lopes, Antônio Carlos; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Departamento de Cirurgia. São Paulo. BR
Clinics ; 72(2): 65-70, Feb. 2017. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-840041
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To present self-assessments of knowledge about mechanical ventilation made by final-year medical students, residents, and physicians taking qualifying courses at the Brazilian Society of Internal Medicine who work in urgent and emergency settings.

METHODS:

A 34-item questionnaire comprising different areas of knowledge and training in mechanical ventilation was given to 806 medical students, residents, and participants in qualifying courses at 11 medical schools in Brazil. The questionnaire’s self-assessment items for knowledge were transformed into scores.

RESULTS:

The average score among all participants was 21% (0-100%). Of the total, 85% respondents felt they did not receive sufficient information about mechanical ventilation during medical training. Additionally, 77% of the group reported that they would not know when to start noninvasive ventilation in a patient, and 81%, 81%, and 89% would not know how to start volume control, pressure control and pressure support ventilation modes, respectively. Furthermore, 86.4% and 94% of the participants believed they would not identify the basic principles of mechanical ventilation in patients with obstructive pulmonary disease and acute respiratory distress syndrome, respectively, and would feel insecure beginning ventilation. Finally, 77% said they would fear for the safety of a patient requiring invasive mechanical ventilation under their care.

CONCLUSION:

Self-assessment of knowledge and self-perception of safety for managing mechanical ventilation were deficient among residents, students and emergency physicians from a sample in Brazil.
Asunto(s)


Texto completo: Disponible Índice: LILACS (Américas) Asunto principal: Respiración Artificial / Autoevaluación (Psicología) / Medicina de Emergencia / Medicina Interna Tipo de estudio: Estudio observacional / Estudio de prevalencia / Estudio pronóstico / Investigación cualitativa / Factores de riesgo Límite: Humanos País/Región como asunto: America del Sur / Brasil Idioma: Inglés Revista: Clinics Asunto de la revista: Medicina Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Brasil Institución/País de afiliación: Universidade Federal de São Paulo/BR

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Índice: LILACS (Américas) Asunto principal: Respiración Artificial / Autoevaluación (Psicología) / Medicina de Emergencia / Medicina Interna Tipo de estudio: Estudio observacional / Estudio de prevalencia / Estudio pronóstico / Investigación cualitativa / Factores de riesgo Límite: Humanos País/Región como asunto: America del Sur / Brasil Idioma: Inglés Revista: Clinics Asunto de la revista: Medicina Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Brasil Institución/País de afiliación: Universidade Federal de São Paulo/BR