Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The burden of chronic ureteral stenting in cervical cancer survivors
Goldfarb, Robert A; Fan, Yunhua; Jarosek, Stephanie; Elliott, Sean P.
  • Goldfarb, Robert A; University of Minnesota. Department of Urology. Minneapolis. US
  • Fan, Yunhua; University of Minnesota. Department of Urology. Minneapolis. US
  • Jarosek, Stephanie; University of Minnesota. Department of Urology. Minneapolis. US
  • Elliott, Sean P; University of Minnesota. Department of Urology. Minneapolis. US
Int. braz. j. urol ; 43(1): 104-111, Jan.-Feb. 2017. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-840803
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Purpose Ureteral obstruction in cervical cancer occurs in up to 11% of patients, many of whom undergo ureteral stenting. Our aim was to describe the patient burden of chronic ureteral stenting in a population-based cohort by detailing two

objectives:

(1) the frequency of repeat procedures for ureteral obstruction; and, (2) the frequency of urinary adverse effects (UAEs) (e.g., lower urinary tract symptoms, flank pain). Materials and Methods From SEER-Medicare, we identified 202 women who underwent ureteral stent placement prior to or following cervical cancer treatment. The frequency of repeat procedures and rate ratios were compared between treatment modalities. The rates and rate ratios of UAEs were compared between our primary cohort (stent + cervical cancer) and the following groups no stent + cervical cancer, stent + no cancer, and no stent + no cancer. The “no cancer” group was drawn from the 5% Medicare sample. Results 117/202 women (58%) underwent >1 stent procedure. The frequency of additional procedures was significantly higher in patients who received radiation as part of their treatment. UAEs were very common in women with stent + cancer. The rate of UTI was 190 (per 100 person-years), 67 for LUTS, 42 for stones, and 6 for flank pain. These rates were 3-10 fold higher than in the no stent + no cancer control group; rates were also higher than in the no stent + cancer and the stent + no cancer women. Conclusions The burden of disease associated with ureteral stents is higher than expected and urologists should be actively involved in stent management, screening for associated symptoms and offering definitive reconstruction when appropriate.
Asunto(s)


Texto completo: Disponible Índice: LILACS (Américas) Asunto principal: Obstrucción Ureteral / Stents / Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino Tipo de estudio: Estudio de etiología / Estudio de incidencia / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Factores de riesgo Límite: Anciano / Aged80 / Femenino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglés Revista: Int. braz. j. urol Asunto de la revista: Urología Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Institución/País de afiliación: University of Minnesota/US

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Índice: LILACS (Américas) Asunto principal: Obstrucción Ureteral / Stents / Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino Tipo de estudio: Estudio de etiología / Estudio de incidencia / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Factores de riesgo Límite: Anciano / Aged80 / Femenino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglés Revista: Int. braz. j. urol Asunto de la revista: Urología Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Institución/País de afiliación: University of Minnesota/US