Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bond strength of composite resin containing biomaterial S-PRG to eroded dentin
Lourenço, Alessandra Sanchez Coelho; Ayres, Ana Paula Almeida; Mantilla, Taís Fonseca; Giannini, Marcelo; Freitas, Patricia Moreira de.
  • Lourenço, Alessandra Sanchez Coelho; Universidade de São Paulo. School of Dentistry. Department of Restorative Dentistry. São Paulo. BR
  • Ayres, Ana Paula Almeida; University of Uberaba. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Uberaba. BR
  • Mantilla, Taís Fonseca; Universidade de São Paulo. School of Dentistry. Department of Restorative Dentistry. São Paulo. BR
  • Giannini, Marcelo; Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba. School of Dentistry. Department of Dental Materials. Piracicaba. BR
  • Freitas, Patricia Moreira de; Universidade de São Paulo. School of Dentistry. Department of Restorative Dentistry. São Paulo. BR
Braz. j. oral sci ; 16: e17057, jan.-dez. 2017. ilus
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-883683
ABSTRACT
To evaluate the bond strength of composite resin containing or not biomaterial (S-PRG) to sound/eroded dentine.

Methods:

Occlusal dentin of 30 human molars (n=15) had half of its surface kept uneroded, while on the other half an erosive lesion was produced by cycling in citric acid (pH 2.3) and supersaturated solution (pH 7.0). On both eroded (ED) and non-eroded (SD) substrates, two restorative systems (containing or not S-PRG) were tested. Composite resin cylinders were built and, after storage in water (24h), were submitted to bond strength test. The analysis of the fracture pattern was performed under an optical microscope (40x). The obtained values of bond strength (MPa) were submitted to ANOVA (two factors) and Tukey multiple comparisons tests (p<0.05).

Results:

According to the results, there was difference between substrates (<0.001) and restorative materials (p=0.002) evaluated. For the microtensile bond strength, the values obtained were SDNB (47.6±12.2 MPa), SDWB (34.1±15.8 MPa), EDNB (31.1±8.3 MPa) and EDWB (15.5±13.6 MPa), revealing a statistically significant difference in the evaluated substrates and restorative materials.

Conclusion:

Bond strength of eroded substrate is inferior to the sound substrate and the restorative system containing S-PRG biomaterial influences negatively the results of bonding to sound/eroded dentin (AU)
Asunto(s)


Texto completo: Disponible Índice: LILACS (Américas) Asunto principal: Erosión de los Dientes / Resinas Compuestas / Dentina Límite: Femenino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglés Revista: Braz. j. oral sci Asunto de la revista: Odontología Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Brasil Institución/País de afiliación: Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba/BR / Universidade de São Paulo/BR / University of Uberaba/BR

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Índice: LILACS (Américas) Asunto principal: Erosión de los Dientes / Resinas Compuestas / Dentina Límite: Femenino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglés Revista: Braz. j. oral sci Asunto de la revista: Odontología Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Brasil Institución/País de afiliación: Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba/BR / Universidade de São Paulo/BR / University of Uberaba/BR