Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The diagnostic value of narrow-band imaging for early and invasive lung cancer: a meta-analysis
Zhu, Juanjuan; Li, Wei; Zhou, Jihong; Chen, Yuqing; Zhao, Chenling; Zhang, Ting; Peng, Wenjia; Wang, Xiaojing.
  • Zhu, Juanjuan; Bengbu Medical College. Department of Respiratory Disease. Bengbu 233004. CN
  • Li, Wei; Bengbu Medical College. Department of Respiratory Disease. Bengbu 233004. CN
  • Zhou, Jihong; Bengbu Medical College. Department of Respiratory Disease. Bengbu 233004. CN
  • Chen, Yuqing; Bengbu Medical College. Department of Respiratory Disease. Bengbu 233004. CN
  • Zhao, Chenling; Bengbu Medical College. Department of Respiratory Disease. Bengbu 233004. CN
  • Zhang, Ting; Bengbu Medical College. Department of Respiratory Disease. Bengbu 233004. CN
  • Peng, Wenjia; Bengbu Medical College. Department of Respiratory Disease. Bengbu 233004. CN
  • Wang, Xiaojing; Bengbu Medical College. Department of Respiratory Disease. Bengbu 233004. CN
Clinics ; 72(7): 438-448, July 2017. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-890709
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to compare the ability of narrow-band imaging to detect early and invasive lung cancer with that of conventional pathological analysis and white-light bronchoscopy. We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Sinomed, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases for relevant studies. Meta-disc software was used to perform data analysis, meta-regression analysis, sensitivity analysis, and heterogeneity testing, and STATA software was used to determine if publication bias was present, as well as to calculate the relative risks for the sensitivity and specificity of narrow-band imaging vs those of white-light bronchoscopy for the detection of early and invasive lung cancer. A random-effects model was used to assess the diagnostic efficacy of the above modalities in cases in which a high degree of between-study heterogeneity was noted with respect to their diagnostic efficacies. The database search identified six studies including 578 patients. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of narrow-band imaging were 86% (95% confidence interval 83-88%) and 81% (95% confidence interval 77-84%), respectively, and the pooled sensitivity and specificity of white-light bronchoscopy were 70% (95% confidence interval 66-74%) and 66% (95% confidence interval 62-70%), respectively. The pooled relative risks for the sensitivity and specificity of narrow-band imaging vs the sensitivity and specificity of white-light bronchoscopy for the detection of early and invasive lung cancer were 1.33 (95% confidence interval 1.07-1.67) and 1.09 (95% confidence interval 0.84-1.42), respectively, and sensitivity analysis showed that narrow-band imaging exhibited good diagnostic efficacy with respect to detecting early and invasive lung cancer and that the results of the study were stable. Narrow-band imaging was superior to white light bronchoscopy with respect to detecting early and invasive lung cancer; however, the specificities of the two modalities did not differ significantly.
Asunto(s)


Texto completo: Disponible Índice: LILACS (Américas) Asunto principal: Imagen de Banda Estrecha / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudio: Estudio diagnóstico / Estudio de tamizaje / Revisiones Sistemáticas Evaluadas Límite: Humanos Idioma: Inglés Revista: Clinics Asunto de la revista: Medicina Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Artículo / Documento de proyecto País de afiliación: China Institución/País de afiliación: Bengbu Medical College/CN

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Índice: LILACS (Américas) Asunto principal: Imagen de Banda Estrecha / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudio: Estudio diagnóstico / Estudio de tamizaje / Revisiones Sistemáticas Evaluadas Límite: Humanos Idioma: Inglés Revista: Clinics Asunto de la revista: Medicina Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Artículo / Documento de proyecto País de afiliación: China Institución/País de afiliación: Bengbu Medical College/CN