Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Current trends of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a developing country
Batagello, Carlos A; Vicentini, Fabio Carvalho; Marchini, Giovanni Scala; Torricelli, Fabio Cesar Miranda; Srougi, Miguel; Nahas, Willian Carlos; Mazzucchi, Eduardo.
Afiliación
  • Batagello, Carlos A; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Grupo de Endourologia Hospital das Clínicas. São Paulo. BR
  • Vicentini, Fabio Carvalho; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Grupo de Endourologia Hospital das Clínicas. São Paulo. BR
  • Marchini, Giovanni Scala; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Grupo de Endourologia Hospital das Clínicas. São Paulo. BR
  • Torricelli, Fabio Cesar Miranda; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Grupo de Endourologia Hospital das Clínicas. São Paulo. BR
  • Srougi, Miguel; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Grupo de Endourologia Hospital das Clínicas. São Paulo. BR
  • Nahas, Willian Carlos; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Grupo de Endourologia Hospital das Clínicas. São Paulo. BR
  • Mazzucchi, Eduardo; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Grupo de Endourologia Hospital das Clínicas. São Paulo. BR
Int. braz. j. urol ; 44(2): 304-313, Mar.-Apr. 2018. tab, graf
Article en En | LILACS | ID: biblio-892969
Biblioteca responsable: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Introduction To present the current practice patterns on percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in a developing country. Materials and Methods A survey was offered to Brazilian urologists during the II International Endourology Symposium held in Sao Paulo, in 2015. The first seven questions were related to demographic data while the 20 remaining were directed to urologists who performed PCNL. Results From 250 participants, 100 replied to the survey, 81% performed PCNL and 60.4% of performers had been in practice for less than 15 years. Eighty-one percent were trained in the prone position and 64% in supine. PCNL was learned during the residency in 66.7% and 2.5% had fellowship training. Prone position was the preferred decubitus for simple or complex calculi, though for obese patients there was no difference. Younger surgeons prefer supine while older surgeons prefer prone. The access was obtained by the surgeon in all cases, 96.3% use fluoroscopy and 3.7% prefer ultrasonography. Forty-seven percent use ultrasonic lithotripters and 4.1% laser. For kidney drainage, 71.6% place a nephrostomy tube. Double J stent is left in 77%. The postoperative image method was CT for 50%. Colonic injury was reported by 25%, predominantly in the senior group without statistically difference between positions. Conclusions From a selected group of urologists, we observe that Brazilian urologists usually gain their own access for PCNL guided by fluoroscopy. They predominantly prefer the prone position, use fascial dilators, ultrasonic lithotripters and place a nephrostomy tube when exiting the kidney. Fellowship programs, ultrasonography, flexible nephoscopy and tubeless procedures could be encouraged.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Índice: LILACS Asunto principal: Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina / Cálculos Renales / Nefrolitotomía Percutánea Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Int. braz. j. urol Asunto de la revista: UROLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Índice: LILACS Asunto principal: Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina / Cálculos Renales / Nefrolitotomía Percutánea Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Int. braz. j. urol Asunto de la revista: UROLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article