Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of root canal filling techniques on the bond strength of epoxy resin-based sealers
Rached-Júnior, Fuad Jacob Abi; Souza, Angélica Moreira; Macedo, Luciana Martins Domingues; Raucci-Neto, Walter; Baratto-Filho, Flares; Silva, Bruno Marques; Silva-Sousa, Yara Teresinha Corrêa.
  • Rached-Júnior, Fuad Jacob Abi; Universidade de Ribeirão Preto. School of Dentistry. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Souza, Angélica Moreira; Universidade de Ribeirão Preto. School of Dentistry. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Macedo, Luciana Martins Domingues; Universidade de Ribeirão Preto. School of Dentistry. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Raucci-Neto, Walter; Universidade de Ribeirão Preto. School of Dentistry. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Baratto-Filho, Flares; Universidade Positivo. School of Dentistry. Curitiba. BR
  • Silva, Bruno Marques; Universidade Positivo. School of Dentistry. Curitiba. BR
  • Silva-Sousa, Yara Teresinha Corrêa; Universidade de Ribeirão Preto. School of Dentistry. Ribeirão Preto. BR
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 30(1): e24, 2016. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-952025
ABSTRACT
Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different root canal filling techniques on the bond strength of epoxy resin-based sealers. Sixty single-rooted canines were prepared using ProTaper (F5) and divided into the following groups based on the root filling technique: Lateral Compaction (LC), Single Cone (SC), and Tagger Hybrid Technique (THT). The following subgroups (n = 10) were also created based on sealer material used: AH Plus and Sealer 26. Two-millimeter-thick slices were cut from all the root thirds and subjected to push-out test. Data (MPa) was analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). The push-out values were significantly affected by the sealer, filling technique, and root third (p < 0.05). AH Plus (1.37 ± 1.04) exhibited higher values than Sealer 26 (0.92 ± 0.51), while LC (1.80 ± 0.98) showed greater bond strength than THT (1.16 ± 0.50) and SC (0.92 ± 0.25). The cervical (1.45 ± 1.14) third exhibited higher bond strength, followed by the middle (1.20 ± 0.72) and apical (0.78 ± 0.33) thirds. AH Plus/LC (2.26 ± 1.15) exhibited the highest bond strength values, followed by AH Plus/THT (1.32 ± 0.61), Sealer 26/LC (1.34 ± 0.42), and Sealer 26/THT (1.00 ± 0.27). The lowest values were obtained with AH Plus/SC and Sealer 26/SC. Thus, it can be concluded that the filling technique affects the bond strength of sealers. LC was associated with higher bond strength between the material and intra-radicular dentine than THT and SC techniques.
Asunto(s)


Texto completo: Disponible Índice: LILACS (Américas) Asunto principal: Materiales de Obturación del Conducto Radicular / Obturación del Conducto Radicular / Recubrimiento Dental Adhesivo / Resinas Epoxi Tipo de estudio: Estudios de evaluación Límite: Humanos Idioma: Inglés Revista: Braz. oral res. (Online) Asunto de la revista: Odontología Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Brasil Institución/País de afiliación: Universidade Positivo/BR / Universidade de Ribeirão Preto/BR

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Índice: LILACS (Américas) Asunto principal: Materiales de Obturación del Conducto Radicular / Obturación del Conducto Radicular / Recubrimiento Dental Adhesivo / Resinas Epoxi Tipo de estudio: Estudios de evaluación Límite: Humanos Idioma: Inglés Revista: Braz. oral res. (Online) Asunto de la revista: Odontología Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Brasil Institución/País de afiliación: Universidade Positivo/BR / Universidade de Ribeirão Preto/BR