Pulmonary Lobectomy: What are the Benefits of Video-assisted Thoracoscopy?
Rev. am. med. respir
;
18(3): 178-183, set. 2018. tab
Artículo
en Inglés
| LILACS
| ID: biblio-977169
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Despite the increasing use of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy, this surgical approach is still controversial in certain aspects. The purpose of this study is to compare the surgical results of video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy to pulmonary lobectomy via thoracotomy. Materials andMethods:
Between 2008 and 2017, 153 patients (n = 89 males) had surgery at the Hospital Universitario Fundación Favaloro.Results:
39/89 patients underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Patients who had video-assisted thoracoscopy and were diagnosed with lung cancer mostly had stage I tumors (25/39 patients). Postoperative complications and mortality rates were similar in both groups. Video-assisted thoracoscopy patients had a significantly shorter pleural drainage time (4 vs. 3 days, p = 0.004) and a shorter length of hospital stay (6 vs. 4 days of stay, p = 0.03). The number of lymph node stations sampled during surgery was higher in the patients operated via thoracotomy (4 vs. 3.5 lymph node stations, p < 0.001).Conclusion:
Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy was at least equivalent to surgery by means of thoracotomy in terms of postoperative complications. The main benefits of the video-assisted thoracoscopy approach were shorter pleural drainage time and length of hospital stay. Special attention should be paid to nodal sampling when the surgery is performed via video-assisted thoracoscopy.
Texto completo:
Disponible
Índice:
LILACS (Américas)
Asunto principal:
Neumonectomía
/
Toracotomía
Idioma:
Inglés
Revista:
Rev. am. med. respir
Asunto de la revista:
Medicina
/
Neumología
Año:
2018
Tipo del documento:
Artículo
País de afiliación:
Argentina
Institución/País de afiliación:
Hospital Universitario Fundación Favaloro/AR
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS