Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Role of MDCT colonography and conventional colonoscopy in evaluation of colo-rectal neoplasms
Suez Canal University Medical Journal. 2009; 12 (1): 1-6
en Inglés | IMEMR | ID: emr-100790
ABSTRACT
The study was conducted to evaluate the role of MDCT colonography in diagnosis of cob-rectal neoplasms compared to conventional colonoscopy. Fifty patients were included in the present study 28 males and 22 females with age ranged from 2 1-75 years old. Patients were presented with variable-size large bowel masses examined by MDCT colonography and conventional colonoscopy. Twenty three-cases were diagnosed by CT colonography as colonic malignancy, 18 cases diagnosed by colonoscopy as colorectal benign polyps "8 polyps measured less than 5mm, 6polyps from 5-10mm and 4 more than 10mm", those were correlated with findings of CT colonography which revealed only 12 benign polyps with size ranged from 6mm to more than 10 mm. The other 9 cases proved to be extra colonic metastases. MDCT colonography allows more definitive evaluation of the different cob-rectal and extra-colonic masses as it is anon-invasive modality. It has a higher sensitivity for detecting a clinically suspected colonic neoplastic mass. The conventional colonoscopy may still have an advantage of detecting very small and superficial mucosal lesions and taking biopsy from the suspected superficial areas
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Índice: IMEMR (Mediterraneo Oriental) Asunto principal: Estudio Comparativo / Colonoscopía / Colonografía Tomográfica Computarizada Límite: Femenino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglés Revista: Suez Canal Univ. Med. J. Año: 2009

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Buscar en Google
Índice: IMEMR (Mediterraneo Oriental) Asunto principal: Estudio Comparativo / Colonoscopía / Colonografía Tomográfica Computarizada Límite: Femenino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglés Revista: Suez Canal Univ. Med. J. Año: 2009