Comparison of two surgical procedures in reduction of mandibular angle fracture
Pakistan Oral and Dental Journal. 2011; 30 (2): 287-290
en Inglés
| IMEMR
| ID: emr-109885
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to determine various post operative complications associated with two surgical procedures used for reduction of mandibular angle fractures. A Quasi-Experimental study was carried out in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, King Edward Medical University/Mayo Hospital, Lahore. The study was carried out from 30[th] April 2006 to 30[th] April 2007on sixty patients with mandibular fractures. They were divided in to two categories. Thirty patients were treated by intra oral approach [Group A] and thirty by extra oral approach [Group B]. At different intervals of their post operative visits, these patients were evaluated for post operative complications of infection, nerve damage, hypertrophic scar, esthetic dissatisfaction, malocclusion and limitation in mouth opening. 20% of the patients treated with extraoral approach presented with post operative nerve damage and no patient treated by intra oral approach showed nerve damage [p=0.02]. Similarly postoperative esthetic dissatisfaction was present in only 6.67% of the patients treated with intraoral approach as compared to 63.33% patients treated with extraoral approach [p=0.00]. Based on this study intra oral approach was considered as more suitable method for the treatment of mandibular angle fractures
Buscar en Google
Índice:
IMEMR (Mediterraneo Oriental)
Asunto principal:
Complicaciones Posoperatorias
/
Resultado del Tratamiento
/
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Orales
Límite:
Adolescente
/
Adulto
/
Femenino
/
Humanos
/
Masculino
Idioma:
Inglés
Revista:
Pak. Oral Dent. J.
Año:
2011
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS