Intercanine and intermolar widths in angle class I, II and III malocclusions
Pakistan Oral and Dental Journal. 2014; 34 (1): 83-86
en En
| IMEMR
| ID: emr-157670
Biblioteca responsable:
EMRO
Malrelation along the transverse plane is one of the most common causes of malocclusion and can be assessed by considering the intercanine and intermolar widths. An endeavour was undertaken to find the intercanine and intermolar widths on 76 dental casts of the individuals having Class I, Class II division 1, Class II division 2, Class III and Class II subdivision malocclusions, visiting orthodontic department of Sardar Begum dental college and hospital, Peshawar. Results were obtained using SPSS version 20 which showed the mean maxillary intermolar widths of 34.6mm*, 34.5mm, 30.9mm, 34.7 mm and 34.18mm for Class I, Class II division 1,Class II division 2,Class III and Class II subdi-vision groups respectively. Mean maxillary intercanine widths were found to be 24.16mm, 24.5mm, 24.6mm, 23.9mm and 23.05mm for Class I, Class II division 1,Class II division 2,Class III and Class II subdivision groups respectively. Similarly mean mandibular intermolar widths were 32.8mm, 33.02mm, 30.3mm, 33.1mm and 32.8mm for Class I, Class II division 1, Class II division 2, Class III and Class II subdivision groups respectively. While mean mandibular intercanine widths were found to be 19.2mm,19.06mm,20.34mm,19.54mm and 18.75mm for the Class I, Class II division 1,Class II division 2,Class III and Class II subdivision groups respectively. ANOVA analysis showed no sta-tistical significant differences in the intermolar and intercanine widths among the five malocclusion groups
Buscar en Google
Índice:
IMEMR
Asunto principal:
Análisis de Varianza
/
Arco Dental
/
Dentición Mixta
/
Maloclusión Clase I de Angle
/
Maloclusión Clase II de Angle
/
Maloclusión de Angle Clase III
Límite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Pak. Oral Dent. J.
Año:
2014