Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of non-mesh [shouldice] versus mesh [lichtenstein] repair in inguinal hernia
Medical Forum Monthly. 2015; 26 (1): 38-40
en Inglés | IMEMR | ID: emr-168193
ABSTRACT
To evaluate the optimum method of repair for inguinal hernia with respect to low rate of recurrence, minimum postoperative pain and cost effectiveness. Retrospective and Comparative study. This study was conducted between 2004-2007 in the surgical department DHQ Hospital Karak from. Either 320 patients were randomly allotted to mesh or non-Mesh repair. They were followed up at the 1[st] week and then 1, 6,12,18,24 and 36[th] month. Clinical outcome that is, recurrence rate, quality of life, Post-oparative pain etc were noted. After 3 year, the recurrence rates were significantly different for the two types of repairs. The Shouldice is usually suited in primary and unilateral inguinal hernial repair in adult males. In addition, The Lichtenstein is best for bilateral and recurrent inguinal hernial repair in old patients [>60 Yrs] and in elective states of repair
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Índice: IMEMR (Mediterraneo Oriental) Asunto principal: Dolor Postoperatorio / Mallas Quirúrgicas / Estudios Retrospectivos / Análisis Costo-Beneficio Límite: Femenino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglés Revista: Med. Forum Mon. Año: 2015

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Buscar en Google
Índice: IMEMR (Mediterraneo Oriental) Asunto principal: Dolor Postoperatorio / Mallas Quirúrgicas / Estudios Retrospectivos / Análisis Costo-Beneficio Límite: Femenino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglés Revista: Med. Forum Mon. Año: 2015