Repair of vesico-vaginal fistula absorbable versus non absorbable suture
Pakistan Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1989; 2 (1): 29-33
en Inglés
| IMEMR
| ID: emr-95127
ABSTRACT
In the repair of Vesico-Vaginal fistula absorbable and non-absorbable suture material has been compared in 38 cases after random selection during 3 year period ending January, 1988. Absorbable suture [catgut 00] was used in 19 cases and non-absorbable suture [prolene 00] in other 19 cases; all other factors being identical in both the groups. There were four failures in the first group [success rate 78%] and one failure in the second group [success rate 95%]. The purpose of the study was to establish the effectiveness of non-absorbable suture material in VVF repair due to the fact that it causes less tissue reaction and better wound healing. There have been no comparable studies
Buscar en Google
Índice:
IMEMR (Mediterraneo Oriental)
Asunto principal:
Histerectomía
/
Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto
Límite:
Femenino
/
Humanos
Idioma:
Inglés
Revista:
Pak. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.
Año:
1989
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS