Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reabilitação não supervisionada: efeitos de treinamento ambulatorial a longo prazo / Unsupervised rehabilitation: effects of exercise training over the long run
Oliveira Filho, Japy Angelini; Leal, Ana Cristina; Lima, Valter Correia; Santos Filho, Dirceu Vieira; Luna Filho, Bráulio.
  • Oliveira Filho, Japy Angelini; Universidade Federal de Säo Paulo. Escola Paulista de Medicina. São Paulo. BR
  • Leal, Ana Cristina; Universidade Federal de Säo Paulo. Escola Paulista de Medicina. São Paulo. BR
  • Lima, Valter Correia; Universidade Federal de Säo Paulo. Escola Paulista de Medicina. São Paulo. BR
  • Santos Filho, Dirceu Vieira; Universidade Federal de Säo Paulo. Escola Paulista de Medicina. São Paulo. BR
  • Luna Filho, Bráulio; Universidade Federal de Säo Paulo. Escola Paulista de Medicina. São Paulo. BR
Arq. bras. cardiol ; 79(3): 233-244, Sept. 2002. tab, graf
Artículo en Portugués, Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-321666
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the safety and efficacy of unsupervised rehabilitation (USR) in the long run in low-risk patients with coronary artery disease.

METHODS:

We carried out a retrospective study with 30 patients divided into group I (GI) - 15 patients from private clinics undergoing unsupervised rehabilitation; group II (GII) - control group, 15 patients from ambulatory clinic basis, paired by age, sex, and clinical findings. GI was stimulated to exercise under indirect supervision (jogging, treadmill, and sports). GII received the usual clinical treatment.

RESULTS:

The pre- and postobservation values in GI were, respectively VO2peak (mL/kg/min), 24±5 and 31± 9; VO2 peak/peak HR 0.18±0.05 and 0.28±0.13; peak double product (DP peak)26,800±7,000 and 29,000 ± 6,500; percent peak HR/predicted HRmax 89.5±9 and 89.3±9. The pre- and post- values in GII were VO2 peak (mL/kg/min), 27± 7 and 28±5; VO2 peak/peak HR 0.2±0.06 and 0.2± 0.05; DP peak 24,900±8,000 and 25,600± 8,000, and percent peak HR/predicted HRmax 91.3±9 and 91.1± 11. The following values were significant preobservation VO2peak versus postobservation VO2peak in GI (p=0.0 063); postobservation VO2peak in GI versus postobservation VO2peak in GII (p=0.0045); postobservation VO2 peak/peak HR GI versus postobservation peak VO2/peak HR in GII (p=0.0000). The follow-up periods in GI and GII were, respectively, 41.33± 20.19 months and 20.60±8.16 months (p<0.05). No difference between the groups was observed in coronary risk factors, therapeutic management, or evolution of ischemia. No cardiovascular events secondary to USR were observed in 620 patient-months.

CONCLUSION:

USR was safe and efficient, in low-risk patients with coronary artery disease and provided benefits at the peripheral level
Asunto(s)
Texto completo: Disponible Índice: LILACS (Américas) Asunto principal: Ejercicio Físico / Enfermedad Coronaria / Terapia por Ejercicio / Atención Ambulatoria Tipo de estudio: Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Factores de riesgo Límite: Femenino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglés / Portugués Revista: Arq. bras. cardiol Asunto de la revista: Cardiología Año: 2002 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Brasil Institución/País de afiliación: Universidade Federal de Säo Paulo/BR

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: Disponible Índice: LILACS (Américas) Asunto principal: Ejercicio Físico / Enfermedad Coronaria / Terapia por Ejercicio / Atención Ambulatoria Tipo de estudio: Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Factores de riesgo Límite: Femenino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglés / Portugués Revista: Arq. bras. cardiol Asunto de la revista: Cardiología Año: 2002 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Brasil Institución/País de afiliación: Universidade Federal de Säo Paulo/BR