Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analysis of the involvement of bioethics in the professional activity oftwo institutions in Bauru, São Paulo
Moura, Patrícia Garcia de; Peres, Sílvia Helena de Carvalho Sales; Pernambuco, Renata de Almeida Pernambuco; Peres, Arsenio Sales.
  • Moura, Patrícia Garcia de; University of São Paulo. Bauru Dental School. Bauru. BR
  • Peres, Sílvia Helena de Carvalho Sales; University of São Paulo. Bauru Dental School. Bauru. BR
  • Pernambuco, Renata de Almeida Pernambuco; University of São Paulo. Bauru Dental School. Bauru. BR
  • Peres, Arsenio Sales; University of São Paulo. Bauru Dental School. Bauru. BR
Braz. j. oral sci ; 4(13): 725-729, Apr.-June 2005.
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-412550
ABSTRACT
This study quantified study projects involving human beings analyzed by the Research Ethics Committees (RECs) of University of São Paulo at Bauru, comprising the Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies and Bauru Dental School. The projects were analyzed by retrospective observational study in a six-year period(1998-2003), in all study areas. The sample comprised 1,246 study projects, being 687 at HRAC and 559 at FOB. The numbers of projects analyzed each year at HRAC and FOB were, respectively 1998 (54, 8), 1999 (72, 38), 2000 (130, 78), 2001 (66, 138), 2002 (191, 195), and 2003 (174, 102). Projects were divided into approved (587, 381), not approved (13, 10), pending (62, 109) and pprovedwith recommendation (25, 59). Projects submitted to the REC of HRAC were mainly related to Speech Therapy (174), followed by Applied Social Work (58); with regard to the REC of FOB, 101 addressed the area of Speech Therapy, followed by Prosthodontics (n=71), Orthodontics (n=69) and Public Health Dentistry (n=65). The main reasons for returning of the projects were informed consent term; methodology; consent from the institutions; explanation onfinancial resources; incorrect filling of forms; risk definition; timetable. It was concluded that the role played by RECs is fundamental, since they assure the requirement of autonomy, and the requirement to protect those whose autonomy is reduced
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Índice: LILACS (Américas) Asunto principal: Bioética Tipo de estudio: Guía de Práctica Clínica / Estudio observacional Límite: Humanos Idioma: Inglés Revista: Braz. j. oral sci Asunto de la revista: Odontología Año: 2005 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Brasil Institución/País de afiliación: University of São Paulo/BR

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Buscar en Google
Índice: LILACS (Américas) Asunto principal: Bioética Tipo de estudio: Guía de Práctica Clínica / Estudio observacional Límite: Humanos Idioma: Inglés Revista: Braz. j. oral sci Asunto de la revista: Odontología Año: 2005 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Brasil Institución/País de afiliación: University of São Paulo/BR