Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Maximum inhibitory dilution of mouthwashes containing chlorhexidine and polyhexamethylene biguanide against salivary staphylococcus aureus
Nascimento, Andresa Piacezzi; Tanomaru, Juliane Maria Guerreiro; Matoba-Júnior, Fumio; Watanabe, Evandro; Tanomaru-Filho, Mario; Ito, Izabel Yoko.
  • Nascimento, Andresa Piacezzi; University of São Paulo. School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Tanomaru, Juliane Maria Guerreiro; São Paulo State University. Araraquara School of Dentistry. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Araraquara. BR
  • Matoba-Júnior, Fumio; University of São Paulo. Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Watanabe, Evandro; University of São Paulo. School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Tanomaru-Filho, Mario; São Paulo State University. Araraquara School of Dentistry. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Araraquara. BR
  • Ito, Izabel Yoko; University of São Paulo. School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto. Ribeirão Preto. BR
J. appl. oral sci ; 16(5): 336-339, Sept.-Oct. 2008. graf, tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-495137
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of the present study was to determine the in vitro maximum inhibitory dilution (MID) of two chlorhexidinebased oral mouthwashes (CHX) Noplak®, Periogard®, and one polyhexamethylene biguanide-based mouthwash (PHMB) Sanifill Premium® against 28 field Staphylococcus aureus strains using the agar dilution method. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

For each product, decimal dilutions ranging from 1/10 to 1/655,360 were prepared in distilled water and added to Mueller Hinton Agar culture medium. After homogenization, the culture medium was poured onto Petri dishes. Strains were inoculated using a Steers multipoint inoculator and dishes were incubated at 37ºC for 24hours. For reading, MID was considered as the maximum dilution of the mouthwash still capable of inhibiting microbial growth.

RESULTS:

Sanifill Premium® inhibited the growth of all strains at 1/40 dilution and of 1 strain at 1/80 dilution. Noplak® inhibited the growth of 23 strains at 1/640 dilution and of all 28 strains at 1/320 dilution. Periogard® showed inhibited growth of 7 strains at 1/640 dilution and of all 28 strains at 1/320 dilution. Data were submitted to Kruskal-Wallis statistical test, showing significant differences between the mouthwashes evaluated (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between Noplak® and Periogard® (p>0.05). Sanifill Premium® was the least effective (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION:

It was concluded that CHX-based mouthwashes present better antimicrobial activity against S. Aureus than the PHMB-based mouthwash.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: Disponible Índice: LILACS (Américas) Asunto principal: Staphylococcus aureus / Biguanidas / Clorhexidina / Antiinfecciosos Locales / Antisépticos Bucales Idioma: Inglés Revista: J. appl. oral sci Asunto de la revista: Odontología Año: 2008 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Brasil Institución/País de afiliación: São Paulo State University/BR / University of São Paulo/BR

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: Disponible Índice: LILACS (Américas) Asunto principal: Staphylococcus aureus / Biguanidas / Clorhexidina / Antiinfecciosos Locales / Antisépticos Bucales Idioma: Inglés Revista: J. appl. oral sci Asunto de la revista: Odontología Año: 2008 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Brasil Institución/País de afiliación: São Paulo State University/BR / University of São Paulo/BR