Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of carisolv and papacárie on theresin-dentin bond strength in sound andcaries-affected primary molars
Cecchin, Doglas; Farina, Ana Paula; Orlando, Franciele; Brusco, Eloisa Helena Corrêa; Carlini-Júnior, Bruno.
Afiliación
  • Cecchin, Doglas; State University of Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Piracicaba. BR
  • Farina, Ana Paula; State University of Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department Prosthodontics and Periodontolog. Piracicaba. BR
  • Orlando, Franciele; University of Passo Fundo. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Passo Fundo. BR
  • Brusco, Eloisa Helena Corrêa; University of Passo Fundo. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Passo Fundo. BR
  • Carlini-Júnior, Bruno; University of Paso Fundo. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Passo Fundo. BR
Braz. j. oral sci ; 9(1): 25-29, Jan.-Mar. 2010. ilus, tab
Article en En | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-578042
Biblioteca responsable: BR28.1
ABSTRACT

Aim:

This study evaluated the influence of different chemomechanical caries removal techniqueson the bond strength of an adhesive system to caries-affected and healthy dentin.

Methods:

Thirty healthy teeth were randomly divided into three groups Group 1 (control) no cariesremoval technique was applied; Group 2 chemomechanical technique using Carisolv®; andGroup 3 chemomechanical technique using Papacárie®Twenty caries-affected teeth were divided .into two groups Group 4 chemomechanical technique using Carisolv; and Group 5chemomechanical technique using Papacárie. The teeth received the application of an etch-andrinse adhesive system, were restored with composite resin, and then sectioned to obtain 4 hourglassshaped slabs from each specimen, which were subjected to a microtensile bond strength test. Datawere analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey’s test (a=0.05).

Results:

G1 (13.387 ± 6.1074),G2 (18.123 ± 3.2611) and G3 (12.781 ± 4.5652) presented statistically significant higher meanbond strength values than the other groups (p<0.05), but did not differ significantly from each other(p>0.05). G4 (6.228 ± 5.3435) and G5 (6.482 ± 3.2076) presented the lowest mean bondstrength values and were statistically similar to each other (p>0.05).

Conclusions:

Neither of thechemomechanical caries removal methods interfered in the resin-dentin bond strength. However,lower tensile bond strength was found to caries-affected dentin.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo: 1 Índice: LILACS Asunto principal: Técnicas In Vitro / Papaína / Recubrimientos Dentinarios / Ácido Glutámico / Caries Dental / Dentina / Leucina / Lisina Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Braz. j. oral sci Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2010 Tipo del documento: Article
Texto completo: 1 Índice: LILACS Asunto principal: Técnicas In Vitro / Papaína / Recubrimientos Dentinarios / Ácido Glutámico / Caries Dental / Dentina / Leucina / Lisina Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Braz. j. oral sci Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2010 Tipo del documento: Article