Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of mechanical properties of five cements for orthodontic band cementation
Brazilian Oral Research; Aguiar, Diego Andrei; Ritter, Daltro Enéas; Rocha, Roberto; Locks, Arno; Borgatto, Adriano Ferreti.
Afiliación
  • Aguiar, Diego Andrei; Univ Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Odontologia. Florianópolis. BR
  • Ritter, Daltro Enéas; Univ Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Odontologia. Florianópolis. BR
  • Rocha, Roberto; Univ Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Odontologia. Florianópolis. BR
  • Locks, Arno; Univ Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Odontologia. Florianópolis. BR
  • Borgatto, Adriano Ferreti; Univ Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Odontologia. Florianópolis. BR
Braz. oral res ; 27(2): 136-141, Mar-Apr/2013. tab
Article en En | LILACS | ID: lil-667996
Biblioteca responsable: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the flexural, compressive and diametral tensile strengths of five cements used in orthodontics for band cementation. Twelve specimens of each cement were tested 1 - GC Fuji Ortho Band (FJ), GC America Inc.; 2 - Meron (MR), Voco; 3 - Multi-Cure Glass Ionomer Band Cement (MC), 3M Unitek; 4 - Band-Lok (BL), Reliance Orthodontic Products; and 5 - Ketac Cem (KC), 3M ESPE. The results (mean) for diametral tensile strength were 10.51 MPa (FJ), 9.60 MPa (MR), 20.04 MPa (MC), 42.80 MPa (BL), and 4.08 MPa (KC). The results for compressive strength were (in the same order) 64.50 MPa, 77.71 MPa, 94.21 MPa, 193.88 MPa, and 81.93 MPa. The results for flexural strength were (in the same order) 20.72 MPa, 25.84 MPa, 53.41 MPa, 137.41 MPa, and 20.50 MPa. The statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests with p-value £ 0.05. In terms of diametral tensile strength, BL showed the highest strength statistically, and MC, the second highest. In terms of compressive tensile strength, BL showed the highest strength statistically, and FJ did not attain the minimum recommended strength. In terms of flexural tensile strength, BL cement was superior to MC, and MR, FJ and KC were equivalent and inferior to BL and MC.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Índice: LILACS Asunto principal: Cemento de Policarboxilato / Óxido de Zinc / Resinas Acrílicas / Cementación / Silicatos de Aluminio / Cementos de Ionómero Vítreo / Óxido de Magnesio Tipo de estudio: Evaluation_studies Idioma: En Revista: Braz. oral res Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2013 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Índice: LILACS Asunto principal: Cemento de Policarboxilato / Óxido de Zinc / Resinas Acrílicas / Cementación / Silicatos de Aluminio / Cementos de Ionómero Vítreo / Óxido de Magnesio Tipo de estudio: Evaluation_studies Idioma: En Revista: Braz. oral res Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2013 Tipo del documento: Article