Analysis of the instrumentation time and cleaning between manual and rotary techniques in deciduous molars
RSBO (Impr.)
;
9(3): 238-244, Jul.-Sep. 2012. ilus, tab
Artículo
en Inglés
| LILACS
| ID: lil-748119
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
The rotary instrumentation provides shorter instrumentation time with greater comfort for the patient but few studies have been conducted on primary teeth.Objective:
his study compared the cleaning ability and instrumentation time between manual and rotary techniques in deciduous molars. Material andmethods:
a total of 15 molars were selected, submitted to coronal opening and root canal filled with India ink. After 48 hours, the teeth were divided into three groups G1 - manual instrumentation with K files, G2 - rotary system Endowave, and G3 - rotary system ProTaper. After instrumentation, the teeth were sectioned and three blinded examiners evaluated the root canal cleaning. The mode of scores of examiners was analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test. The instrumentation time was recorded and the results were statistically analyzed by ANOVA.Results:
the ProTaper system presented shorter instrumentation time compared to manual instrumentation (p = 0.0339). Endowave system did not present statistically significant difference in the instrumentation time compared to the other groups. There were no significant differences between groups concerning the ability of root canal cleaning (p = 0.6188).Conclusion:
ProTaper system revealed shorter treatment time and similar cleaning ability compared to the other techniques, thus being indicated for deciduous teeth.
Texto completo:
Disponible
Índice:
LILACS (Américas)
Tipo de estudio:
Guía de Práctica Clínica
Idioma:
Inglés
Revista:
RSBO (Impr.)
Asunto de la revista:
Odontología
Año:
2012
Tipo del documento:
Artículo
País de afiliación:
Brasil
Institución/País de afiliación:
Pontificial Catholic University of Campinas/BR
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS