Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: updated results of the Seoul National university hospital experience
Kim, Hyung Suk; Lee, Joong Sub; Jeong, Chang Wook; Kwak, Cheol; Kim, Hyeon Hoe; Ku, Ja Hyeon.
  • Kim, Hyung Suk; Seoul National University. College of Medicine. Department of Urology. Seoul. KR
  • Lee, Joong Sub; Seoul National University. College of Medicine. Department of Urology. Seoul. KR
  • Jeong, Chang Wook; Seoul National University. College of Medicine. Department of Urology. Seoul. KR
  • Kwak, Cheol; Seoul National University. College of Medicine. Department of Urology. Seoul. KR
  • Kim, Hyeon Hoe; Seoul National University. College of Medicine. Department of Urology. Seoul. KR
  • Ku, Ja Hyeon; Seoul National University. College of Medicine. Department of Urology. Seoul. KR
Int. braz. j. urol ; 41(6): 1067-1079, Nov.-Dec. 2015. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-769747
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The objective of this study was to update the long-term outcome in the treatment of locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) regarding the role of adjuvant chemotherapy. Materials and methods: Clinical data from 138 patients who underwent RNU for locally advanced UTUC (pT3/4 or pN+) were analyzed. Results: The adjuvant chemotherapy group comprised 66 patients, and other 72 patients did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy was the most common regimen, depending on the patient's eligibility and renal function. The median follow-up period was 48.7 months (interquartile range: 29.2-96.9 months). The 3-and 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were 76.0% and 69.9% for the non-adjuvant chemotherapy group versus 74.6% and 54.5% for the adjuvant chemotherapy group (p=0.301, log-rank test). Overall survival (OS) rates for the same time period were 70.1% and 62.9% for the non-adjuvant chemotherapy group versus 73.8% and 53.2% for the adjuvant chemotherapy group (p=0.931, log-rank test). On multivariate analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy could not predict DSS and OS after surgery. When patients who received cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy (n=59) were compared to those who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy, similar results were found. Conclusions: There does not appear to be a significant DSS or OS benefit associated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Prospective randomized clinical trials are necessary to verify the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on locally advanced UTUC.
Asunto(s)


Texto completo: Disponible Índice: LILACS (Américas) Asunto principal: Neoplasias Ureterales / Carcinoma de Células Transicionales / Cisplatino / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudio: Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Factores de riesgo Límite: Anciano / Femenino / Humanos / Masculino País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: Inglés Revista: Int. braz. j. urol Asunto de la revista: Urología Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Artículo / Documento de proyecto País de afiliación: Corea del Sur Institución/País de afiliación: Seoul National University/KR

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Índice: LILACS (Américas) Asunto principal: Neoplasias Ureterales / Carcinoma de Células Transicionales / Cisplatino / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudio: Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Factores de riesgo Límite: Anciano / Femenino / Humanos / Masculino País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: Inglés Revista: Int. braz. j. urol Asunto de la revista: Urología Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Artículo / Documento de proyecto País de afiliación: Corea del Sur Institución/País de afiliación: Seoul National University/KR