Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improving adhesion between luting cement and zirconia-based ceramic with an alternative surface treatment
MARTINS, Aurealice Rosa Maria; GOTTI, Valéria Bisinoto; SHIMANO, Marcos Massao; BORGES, Gilberto Antônio; GONÇALVES, Luciano de Souza.
  • MARTINS, Aurealice Rosa Maria; Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Piracicaba. BR
  • GOTTI, Valéria Bisinoto; Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Piracicaba. BR
  • SHIMANO, Marcos Massao; Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Piracicaba. BR
  • BORGES, Gilberto Antônio; Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Piracicaba. BR
  • GONÇALVES, Luciano de Souza; Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Piracicaba. BR
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 29(1): 1-2, 2015. tab, ilus
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-777224
ABSTRACT
This study evaluated the influence of an alternative surface treatment on the microshear bond strength (μsbs) of zirconia-based ceramic. Thirty-five zirconia disks were assigned to five groups according to the following treatments Control (CO), glass and silane were not applied to the zirconia surface; G1, air blasted with 100μm glass beads + glaze + silane; G2, a gel containing 15% (by weight) glass beads applied to the ceramic surface + glaze + silane; G3, a gel containing 25% (by weight) glass beads applied to the ceramic surface + glaze + silane; and G4, a gel containing 50% (by weight) glass beads applied to the ceramic surface + glaze + silane. The specimens were built up using RelyX ARC®, according to the manufacturer’s recommendations, and inserted in an elastomeric mold with an inner diameter of 0.8 mm. The μsbs test was performed using a testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. ANOVA and Tukey’s test (p < 0.05) were applied to the bond strength values (in MPa). CO (15.6 ± 4.1) showed the lowest μsbs value. There were no statistical differences between the G1 (24.9 ± 7.4), G2 (24.9 ± 2.3), G3 (35.0 ± 10.3) and G4 (35.3 ± 6.0) experimental groups. Those groups submitted to surface treatments with higher concentrations of glass showed a lower frequency of adhesive failures. In conclusion, the glass application improved the interaction between the ceramic and the luting cement.
Asunto(s)


Texto completo: Disponible Índice: LILACS (Américas) Asunto principal: Circonio / Cerámica / Cementación / Cementos Dentales / Vidrio Tipo de estudio: Estudios de evaluación / Guía de Práctica Clínica Idioma: Inglés Revista: Braz. oral res. (Online) Asunto de la revista: Odontología Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Brasil Institución/País de afiliación: Universidade Estadual de Campinas/BR

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Índice: LILACS (Américas) Asunto principal: Circonio / Cerámica / Cementación / Cementos Dentales / Vidrio Tipo de estudio: Estudios de evaluación / Guía de Práctica Clínica Idioma: Inglés Revista: Braz. oral res. (Online) Asunto de la revista: Odontología Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Brasil Institución/País de afiliación: Universidade Estadual de Campinas/BR