Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative study of intrathecal pethidine versus lignocaine as an anaesthetic and a postoperative analgesic for perianal surgery.
J Postgrad Med ; 1996 Apr-Jun; 42(2): 43-5
Artículo en Inglés | IMSEAR | ID: sea-116295
ABSTRACT
100 patients with ASA risk I & II and undergoing perianal surgery were studied for anaesthetic effects and postoperative analgesia following either intrathecal pethidine or lignocaine. Saddle block was performed either with intrathecal pethidine 5% (50 mg/ml) 0.5 mg/kg or 1 ml of 5% lignocaine. Sensory and motor block postoperative analgesia, need for additional analgesia were studied. The onset of sensory and motor blockade with lignocaine was faster than pethidine. However the sensory and motor blockade lasted longer with pethidine. The duration of postoperative analgesia was 15.39 +/- 5.14 hours as against duration of postoperative analgesia with lignocaine which was 1.3 +/- 0.53 hours. Only 10% of patients in the pethidine group required intramuscular analgesic supplementation whereas 30% of patients in the lignocaine group required intramuscular analgesic supplementation.
Asunto(s)
Texto completo: Disponible Índice: IMSEAR (Asia Sudoriental) Asunto principal: Enfermedades del Ano / Dolor Postoperatorio / Factores de Tiempo / Dimensión del Dolor / Femenino / Humanos / Masculino / Analgésicos Opioides / Adyuvantes Anestésicos / Anestesia Raquidea Tipo de estudio: Ensayo Clínico Controlado Idioma: Inglés Revista: J Postgrad Med Año: 1996 Tipo del documento: Artículo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: Disponible Índice: IMSEAR (Asia Sudoriental) Asunto principal: Enfermedades del Ano / Dolor Postoperatorio / Factores de Tiempo / Dimensión del Dolor / Femenino / Humanos / Masculino / Analgésicos Opioides / Adyuvantes Anestésicos / Anestesia Raquidea Tipo de estudio: Ensayo Clínico Controlado Idioma: Inglés Revista: J Postgrad Med Año: 1996 Tipo del documento: Artículo