Development and evaluation of 'neck pain and functional limitation scale': A validation study in the Asian context.
Indian J Med Sci
;
2009 Oct; 63(10) 445-454
Artículo
en Inglés
| IMSEAR
| ID: sea-145452
ABSTRACT
Background:
There is a paucity of literature on validated outcome measurement tools for evaluation of neck pain and related disability in the Asian context.Aim:
The main aim of the present study was to design a new tool called neck pain functional limitation scale (NPFLS) for measuring disability related to neck pain and observe its reliability, concurrent validity and criterion validity. Setting anddesign:
This study was performed at the institutional hospital. Materials andmethods:
A total of 157 subjects (neck pain group) and 25 control subjects (control group) without neck pain were recruited for this study. NPFLS was framed as a new tool for this study, which consisted of 5 domains - pain intensity, activities of daily living, social activities, functional activities and psychological factors. Neck Bournemouth questionnaire (NBQ) was used as a gold standard to measure the concurrent validity and criterion validity of the NPFLS. Statisticalanalysis:
Criterion validity and concurrent validity between the neck Bournemouth questionnaire (NBQ) and NPFLS scores were tested statistically using Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman correlation test. The reliability was tested by examining the internal consistency to calculate the Cronbach's alpha value for each item in NPFLS.Results:
No significant difference between NPFLS and NBQ was observed using Mann-Whitney U Test, with P value greater than 0.05 (P= 0.557). Besides that, NPFLS had a high concurrent validity (r= 0.916) and good internal consistency with high Cronbach's alpha value of (r= 0.948), which demonstrated strong correlation between the items of NPFLS and NBQ.Conclusion:
NPFLS demonstrated good reliability, high concurrent validity and criterion validity in this study. NPFLS can be used to assess neck pain and disability among patients with neck pain.
Texto completo:
Disponible
Índice:
IMSEAR (Asia Sudoriental)
Asunto principal:
Asia
/
Anciano de 80 o más Años
/
Dimensión del Dolor
/
Anciano
/
Femenino
/
Humanos
/
Masculino
/
Actividades Cotidianas
/
Intervalos de Confianza
/
Estudios Transversales
Tipo de estudio:
Estudio de etiología
/
Estudio observacional
/
Estudio de prevalencia
/
Factores de riesgo
Límite:
Aged80
País/Región como asunto:
Asia
Idioma:
Inglés
Revista:
Indian J Med Sci
Año:
2009
Tipo del documento:
Artículo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS