Quality of life in glaucoma patients: Comparison of medical therapy, trabeculectomy, and glaucoma drainage device surgery

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To compare the quality of life (QoL) in patients with glaucoma on medical therapy and after trabeculectomy and glaucoma drainage device (GDD) using vision, glaucoma, and surgery?specific questionnaires. Methods: This cross?sectional study enrolled 30 patients of moderate to severe glaucoma, each in medical, trabeculectomy, and GDD groups. National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25 (NEIVFQ?25), Glaucoma Quality of Life (GQL?15), and Surgery Specific Questionnaire (SSQ) were administered, and cumulative scores were compared. Results: The mean age of the participants was 58.95 ± 13.6 years with a male preponderance (73.3%, n = 66). The mean scores (SD) in the medical, trabeculectomy, and GDD groups using NEIVFQ?25 were 68.97 (6.98), 72.83 (7.81), and 75.20 (8.77), respectively, those using GQL?15 were 20.63 (6.00), 26.23 (9.12), and 28.43 (7.74), respectively, and for the SSQ, they were 74.33 (8.75) and 72.10 (5.92) in trabeculectomy and GDD groups, respectively. NEIVFQ?25 showed a better QoL in the GDD group compared to the medical group, whereas GQL?15 showed a better QoL in the medical group and comparable QoL in trabeculectomy and GDD. Both these QoL scores correlated to the LogMAR visual acuity. SSQ scores did not show a significant difference in the QoL across both surgical groups. Conclusion: NEIVFQ?25 questionnaire scores provided a holistic measure of QoL. GQL?15 assessed the activity limitation and visual disability of the patients but did not take into account the general health and psychological factors influencing the QoL. We did not find a significant difference between trabeculectomy and GDD using the SSQ. For QoL assessment in medically or surgically treated glaucoma, vision?specific and disease?specific questionnaires should always be used in conjunction