Effect of different gastric mucosa preparation programs on the quality of painless gastroscopy / 中国实用护理杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective:To analyze the effect of different gastric mucosa preparation programs on the quality of painless gastroscopy, so as to provide reference for developing mucosal preparation programs.Methods:This was a prospective, randomized controlled study. A total of 150 patients with painless gastroscopy from March 2021 to December 2022 in Shanxi Yuncheng Central Hospital were selected by convenience sampling in this study, they were assigned to control group, water group, and soda water group by random digits table method, each group contained 50 patients. All patients received oral administration of pronase + dimeticone + sodium bicarbonate solution. In addition, control group: prohibited from drinking 4 hours before examination; water group: drinking 200 ml of pure water 2 hours before examination; and soda water group: drinking 200 ml of soda water 2 hours before examination. The clarity score of gastric mucosa and the detection rate of small lesions were compared among the three groups.Results:There were 28 males and 22 females in the control group, aged (47.62 ± 13.83) years old. There were 30 males and 20 females in the water group, aged (44.68 ± 13.61) years old. There were 24 males and 26 females in the soda water group, aged (46.92 ± 12.79) years old. The difference of esophagus, gastric body, gastric antrum and total mucosal clarity scores among the three groups were statistically significant ( F values were 3.68-25.75, all P<0.05). Multiple comparison showed that the esophagus, gastric antrum and total mucosal clarity scores were (1.87 ± 0.58), (1.37 ± 0.34), (6.72 ± 0.92) points in the control group, which were higher than (1.47 ± 0.41), (1.18 ± 0.31), (5.97 ± 0.86) points in the water group, and (1.42 ± 0.41), (1.02 ± 0.22), (5.50 ± 0.79) points in the soda water group, the differences were statistically significant ( t values were 2.67-5.95, all P<0.05). The gastric antrum and total mucosal clarity scores in the water group were higher than in the soda water group, the differences were statistically significant ( t=7.11, 2.71, both P<0.05). The gastric body mucosal clarity score was (1.98 ± 0.74) points in the control group, which was higher than (1.64 ± 0.54) points in the soda water group, the difference was statistically significant ( t=2.66, P<0.05). The gastroscopy examination time and flushin times were (135.20 ± 21.60) s and (1.37 ± 0.43) times in the control group, while (115.52 ± 14.74) s, (0.90 ± 0.29) times and (107.48 ± 13.02) s, (0.62 ± 0.23) times in the water group and soda water group, the control group was higher than the water group and the soda water group, and the water group was also higher than the soda water group, the differences were statistically significant ( t values were 2.38-11.40, all P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the detection rate of small lesions among the three groups (all P>0.05). Conclusions:Drinking soda water 2 hours before painless gastroscopy can significantly improve the clarity of patients′gastric mucosa, shorten the examination time and reduce flushing times, but it does not improve the detection rate of small lesions.