Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blocks in different interscalene levels / 中华神经医学杂志
Chinese Journal of Neuromedicine ; (12): 296-299, 2017.
Article en Zh | WPRIM | ID: wpr-1034549
Biblioteca responsable: WPRO
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the safety and effectiveness of two different interscalene brachial plexus blocks.Methods Sixty patients scheduled for shoulder surgery (American Society of Anesthesiologists grading Ⅰ-Ⅱ) were randomly divided into two groups:those who received ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block in the sixth cervical vertebra level were chosen as control group (n=30) and those who received in the seventh cervical vertebra level were as experimental group (n=30).They were all injected with 0.5% ropivacaine 10 mL.The incidence ofphrenic nerve palsy,results of blood gas before and 30 min after brachial plexus block,brachial plexus block range,motor block of shoulder and duration of analgesia were recorded and evaluated.Results Phrenic nerve block rate of the fourth cervical vertebra in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (93.3% vs.33.3%,P<0.05),while that of eighth cervical vertebra in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (23.3% vs.66.7%,P<0.05);no significant differences were noted between the two groups at fifth,sixth and seventh cervical vertebra levels (P>0.05).No statistical difference was found between the two groups in the blood gas before brachial plexus block (P>0.05);30 min after brachial plexus block,the oxgen partial pressure of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of control group ([78.1±6.3] mmHg vs.[70.2±6.4] mmHg,P<0.05) and the carbon dioxide partial pressure had no significant difference between the two groups ([42.3±3.7] mmHg vs.[41.2±4.5] mmHg,P>0.05).The motor block of shoulder showed no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the duration of analgesia between the two groups ([16.3±4.3] h vs.[15.8±4.1] h,P>0.05).No other complications were noted besides phrenic nerve block in the two groups.Conclusion.As compared with the control group,the experimental group has lower phrenic nerve block rate and downward of anesthesia level,and similar analgesic effect.
Palabras clave
Texto completo: 1 Índice: WPRIM Idioma: Zh Revista: Chinese Journal of Neuromedicine Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article
Texto completo: 1 Índice: WPRIM Idioma: Zh Revista: Chinese Journal of Neuromedicine Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article