Two-port access versus four-port access laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science
;
: 379-385, 2014.
Artículo
en Inglés
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-110052
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
This study was conducted to compare the surgical outcomes between two-port access and four-port access laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy.METHODS:
Four hundred and eighty nine patients who had received two-port access laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (n=175) and four-port access laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (n=314) in Chungnam National University Hospital from January 2009 to August 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. The data were compared between the bilaterality of the cysts and cyst diameter of less than 6 cm and 6 cm or more.RESULTS:
There were no significant differences in patient's age, parity, body weight, body mass index and history of previous surgery between the two-port and four-port access laparoscopy group. Bilaterality of ovarian cysts was more in fourport access laparoscopy group (13.7% vs. 32.5%, P=0.000). There were no significant differences in operation time, hemoglobin change, hospital stay, adhesiolysis, transfusion, and insertion of hemo-vac between the two-port and four-port access laparoscopy group for size matched compare. However additional analgesics were more in four-port access laparoscopy group for unilateral ovarian cystectomy.CONCLUSION:
Two-port access laparoscopic surgery was feasible and safe for unilateral and bilateral ovarian cystectomy compare with four-port access laparoscopic surgery.
Texto completo:
Disponible
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental)
Asunto principal:
Quistes Ováricos
/
Paridad
/
Peso Corporal
/
Índice de Masa Corporal
/
Cistectomía
/
Estudios Retrospectivos
/
Laparoscopía
/
Analgésicos
/
Tiempo de Internación
Tipo de estudio:
Estudio observacional
Límite:
Femenino
/
Humanos
Idioma:
Inglés
Revista:
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science
Año:
2014
Tipo del documento:
Artículo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS