Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Culprit-Lesion-Only Versus Multivessel Revascularization Using Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-Based Analysis
Korean Circulation Journal ; : 718-725, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | WPRIM | ID: wpr-113386
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES:

In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease, complete revascularization (CR) for non-culprit lesions is not routinely recommended. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of multivessel compared with infarct-related artery (IRA)-only revascularization in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI. SUBJECTS AND

METHODS:

From the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR) database, 1,094 STEMI patients with multivessel disease who underwent primary PCI with drug-eluting stents were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into two groups culprit-vessel-only revascularization (COR, n=827) group; multivessel revascularization, including non-IRA (MVR, n=267) group. The primary endpoint of this study included major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), such as death, myocardial infarction, or target or nontarget lesion revascularization at one year.

RESULTS:

There was no difference in clinical characteristics between the two groups. During the one-year follow-up, 102 (15.2%) patients in the COR group and 32 (14.2%) in the MVR group experienced at least one MACE (p=0.330). There were no differences between the two groups in terms of rates of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization (2.1% vs. 2.0%, 0.7% vs. 0.8%, and 11.7% vs. 10.1%, respectively; p=0.822, 0.910, and 0.301, respectively). The MACE rate was higher in the incompletely revascularized patients than in the completely revascularized patients (15% vs. 9.5%, p=0.039), and the difference was attributable to a higher rate of nontarget vessel revascularization (8.6% vs. 1.8%, p=0.002).

CONCLUSION:

Although multivessel angioplasty during primary PCI for STEMI did not reduce the MACE rate compared with culprit-vessel-only PCI, CR was associated with a lower rate of repeat revascularization after multivessel PCI.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: Disponible Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) Asunto principal: Arterias / Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria / Estudios de Seguimiento / Angioplastia / Stents Liberadores de Fármacos / Intervención Coronaria Percutánea / Glicosaminoglicanos / Infarto del Miocardio Tipo de estudio: Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Factores de riesgo Límite: Humanos Idioma: Inglés Revista: Korean Circulation Journal Año: 2011 Tipo del documento: Artículo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: Disponible Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) Asunto principal: Arterias / Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria / Estudios de Seguimiento / Angioplastia / Stents Liberadores de Fármacos / Intervención Coronaria Percutánea / Glicosaminoglicanos / Infarto del Miocardio Tipo de estudio: Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Factores de riesgo Límite: Humanos Idioma: Inglés Revista: Korean Circulation Journal Año: 2011 Tipo del documento: Artículo