Comparision of Ketamine Versus Propofol for Intravenous Anesthesia Undergoing Dilatation and Currettage in the Gynecological Patients / 대한마취과학회지
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
;
: 1200-1205, 1992.
Artículo
en Coreano
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-115437
ABSTRACT
Intravenous anesthesia of propofol was compared with ketamine on 20 gynecological patients undergoing dilatation and currettage. The patients were randomly assigned to study in two treatment groups so that l0 patients was administered ketamine anesthesia and 10 patients was administered propofol anesthesia. The hemodynamic responses and recovery characteristics of the two group were compared with control group. Arterial blood pressure(systolie, .mean, diastolic) and heart rate after induction were significantly increased in ketamine group, but showed significantly decrease in propofol group(table 5). Time to full recovery(mean+/-SD) was significantly less in the propofol group(14.3+/-2.9 min vs 40.2+/-4.l min, p<0.01)(table 4). The authors conclude that intravenos anesthesia of propofol is a pratical alternative technique for gynecological patients undergoing dilatation and currettage and may be preferable to ketamine because of the significantly shorter recovery time.
Texto completo:
Disponible
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental)
Asunto principal:
Propofol
/
Dilatación
/
Frecuencia Cardíaca
/
Hemodinámica
/
Anestesia
/
Ketamina
/
Anestesia Intravenosa
Límite:
Humanos
Idioma:
Coreano
Revista:
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
Año:
1992
Tipo del documento:
Artículo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS