Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Decompression: A Comparative Study Between Bilateral Laminotomy and Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression
Article en En | WPRIM | ID: wpr-141095
Biblioteca responsable: WPRO
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Bilateral laminotomy and unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression are becoming the minimally invasive procedures for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). With the aim of less invasiveness and better preservation of spinal stability, these techniques have been developed. But there are no large randomized studies to show the surgical results between these two techniques. The objective of this study was to examine the safety and efficacy of these two minimally invasive techniques. METHODS: A total of 80 patients were included in this study (Group I : bilateral laminotomy, Group II : Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression). Perioperative parameters and complications were analyzed. Symptoms and scores such as visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and SF-36 scores of prospectively accrued patients were assessed preoperatively and at 1 month and 12 months after surgery. Paired-t test, two-sample student-t tests, and nonparametric tests were used to determine cross-sectional differences between two groups. RESULTS: No major complications such as spinal instability or deaths occurred during follow-up periods. VAS, ODI scores and SF-36 body pain and physical function scores showed statistically significant improvements in both groups (p<0.001). The significant widening of the spinal canal diameter was also noted in both groups. But, in Group II, there were minor postoperative complications such as dural tear (2 cases 5.0%), fracture of ipsilateral inferior facet (1 case 2.5%), and 5 cases of transient leg symptoms of contralateral side. CONCLUSION: Both bilateral laminotomy and unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression allow achievement of adequate and long-lasting operative results in patients with LSS. But postoperative complications are more frequent in Group II (unilateral laminotomy and bilateral decompression). These results indicate that bilateral laminotomy is the preferred minimally invasive technique to treat symptomatic LSS.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo: 1 Índice: WPRIM Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Canal Medular / Estenosis Espinal / Estudios Prospectivos / Estudios de Seguimiento / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos / Descompresión / Escala Visual Analógica / Laminectomía / Pierna Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society Año: 2007 Tipo del documento: Article
Texto completo: 1 Índice: WPRIM Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Canal Medular / Estenosis Espinal / Estudios Prospectivos / Estudios de Seguimiento / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos / Descompresión / Escala Visual Analógica / Laminectomía / Pierna Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society Año: 2007 Tipo del documento: Article