Comparison of Efficacy between MonoPrep(R) and Papanicolaou Smear for Cervical Cancer Screening / 대한산부인과학회잡지
Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
;
: 109-117, 2004.
Artículo
en Coreano
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-182595
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
To compare the specimen adequacy and cytologic diagnostic results of MonoPrep(R), a type of liquid based preparation, with the conventional Pap smear.METHODS:
In randomly selected 156 patients who visited the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University Hospital for cervical biopsy, conventional Pap smear and matched MonoPrep(R) were performed. Statistical analysis was performed with chi-square test.RESULTS:
There were more "Unsatisfactory" and "Satisfactory but limited by (SBLB)" results in the conventional Pap smear group, even though no statistical significance could be found between the two groups. ASC/LSIL ratio was significantly decreased in the MonoPrep(R) group, showing 0.4 with MonoPrep(R) and 1.9 with conventional Pap smear demonstrating a 78.4% decrease (P<0.001). In detecting abnormal cervical lesions, conventional pap smear showed a sensitivity of 87.7%, positive predictability of 82.3%, false negativity of 10.3%, while MonoPrep(R) showed a sensitivity of 94.8% (P=0.04), positive predictability of 97.4% (P<0.001), and false negativity of 2.6% (P=0.016).CONCLUSION:
MonoPrep(R) is more effective for the detection of cervical lesions with higher sensitivity and lower false negativity compared to conventional pap smear.
Texto completo:
Disponible
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental)
Asunto principal:
Biopsia
/
Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino
/
Tamizaje Masivo
/
Prueba de Papanicolaou
/
Ginecología
/
Obstetricia
Tipo de estudio:
Estudio diagnóstico
/
Estudio de tamizaje
Límite:
Humanos
Idioma:
Coreano
Revista:
Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Año:
2004
Tipo del documento:
Artículo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS