Standard versus Rotation Technique for Insertion of Supraglottic Airway Devices: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Supraglottic airway devices have been widely utilized as an alternative to tracheal intubation in various clinical situations. The rotation technique has been proposed to improve the insertion success rate of supraglottic airways. However, the clinical efficacy of this technique remains uncertain as previous results have been inconsistent, depending on the variable evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in April 2015 for randomized controlled trials that compared the rotation and standard techniques for inserting supraglottic airways. RESULTS: Thirteen randomized controlled trials (1505 patients, 753 with the rotation technique) were included. The success rate at the first attempt was significantly higher with the rotation technique than with the standard technique [relative risk (RR) 1.13; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05 to 1.23; p=0.002]. The rotation technique provided significantly higher overall success rates (RR 1.06; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.09; p<0.001). Device insertion was completed faster with the rotation technique (mean difference -4.6 seconds; 95% CI -7.37 to -1.74; p=0.002). The incidence of blood staining on the removed device (RR 0.36; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.47; p<0.001) was significantly lower with the rotation technique. CONCLUSION: The rotation technique provided higher first-attempt and overall success rates, faster insertion, and a lower incidence of blood on the removed device, reflecting less mucosal trauma. Thus, it may be considered as an alternative to the standard technique when predicting or encountering difficulty in inserting supraglottic airways.