Yields and Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided 19-Gauge Trucut Biopsy versus 22-Gauge Fine Needle Aspiration for Diagnosing Gastric Subepithelial Tumors
Clinical Endoscopy
;
: 152-157, 2015.
Artículo
en Inglés
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-203526
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS:
To evaluate the yields and utility of 19-gauge (G) Trucut biopsy (TCB) versus 22 G fine needle aspiration (FNA) for diagnosing gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs).METHODS:
We retrieved data for 152 patients with a gastric SET larger than 2 cm who had undergone endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided 19 G TCB (n=90) or 22 G FNA (n=62). Relevant clinical, tumor-specific, and EUS procedural information was reviewed retrospectively.RESULTS:
A specific diagnosis was made for 76 gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and 51 non-GIST SETs. The diagnostic yield of TCB was greater than that of FNA (77.8% vs. 38.7%, p<0.001). The percentage of non-diagnostic specimens (suspicious and insufficient) was significantly lower in the TCB group (6.7% and 15.5%, respectively) than in the FNA group (22.6% and 38.7%, respectively; both p<0.001). TCB accurately diagnosed 90.9% of GISTs and 81.1% of non-GIST SETs, whereas FNA accurately diagnosed 68.8% of GISTs and 14.3% of non-GIST SETs. There were nine technical failures with TCB, and the rate of adverse events did not differ between the groups (TCB vs. FNA, 3.3% vs. 8.1%; p=0.27).CONCLUSIONS:
Nineteen-gauge TCB is safe and highly valuable for diagnosing gastric SETs larger than 2 cm if technical failure can be avoided.
Texto completo:
Disponible
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental)
Asunto principal:
Estómago
/
Biopsia
/
Estudios Retrospectivos
/
Endosonografía
/
Biopsia con Aguja Fina
/
Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal
/
Diagnóstico
/
Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico
/
Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa
Tipo de estudio:
Estudio diagnóstico
/
Estudio observacional
Límite:
Humanos
Idioma:
Inglés
Revista:
Clinical Endoscopy
Año:
2015
Tipo del documento:
Artículo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS