Emergent hysterectomy and angiographic embolization for the management of obstetrical hemorrhage: 8-year experiences / 대한산부인과학회지

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical characteristics and outcome of hysterectomy and angiographic embolization in the management of obstetrical hemorrhage unresponsive to conservative management. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 88 patients who underwent hysterectomy and 53 patients who underwent angiographic embolization for the management of obstetrical hemorrhage from January 1999 to July 2007. We analyzed the maternal characteristics and outcomes by the review of medical records and telephone interview. Nonparametric test was performed for comparison of both groups. RESULTS: Angiographic embolization for the management of obstetrical hemorrhage is on the increase year by year, consisting of about three quarters of total cases in the last year. The most common indication of hysterectomy was abnormal placentation (68.2%) followed by uterine atony (25.0%). For the embolization, the most common indication was uterine atony (54.7%) followed by abnormal placentation (17%). The median pre-operative hemoglobin was significantly lower in embolization group than hysterectomy group [8.3 (3.8~12.7 g/dL) vs. 10.8 (2.4~13.7 g/dL), P<0.001]. There was no difference in the total transfusion amount of packed RBC between the two groups. The median hospital stay was shorter in embolization group [8 (5~57 days) vs. 6 (3~14 days), P<0.001]. Overall success rate of embolization was 89% and procedure-related acute complications were not occurred. Of the total population, there was one maternal death in the hysterectomy group. We found that most women who underwent the embolization resume normal menstruation. CONCLUSION: Angiographic embolization for the management of obstetrical hemorrhage is more commonly performed in recent years. Angiographic embolization was associated with shorter hospital stay, reasonable success rate, and minimal complication rate.