Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is sham acupuncture as effective as traditional Chinese acupuncture? It's too early to say / 中国结合医学杂志
Chinese journal of integrative medicine ; (12): 483-489, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | WPRIM | ID: wpr-229511
ABSTRACT
Many clinical trials and experimental studies claim that sham acupuncture is as effective as traditional Chinese acupuncture. However, these studies have no standard sham acupuncture control and many other factors can affect the clinical effect. These factors include needle retention time, treatment frequency, and the total number of treatments needed for satisfactory results, and all can change the clinical effect. The majority of existing acupuncture treatment studies do not consider these factors and lack standard dosage criteria. Therefore, it is still too early to conclude that sham acupuncture is as effective as traditional Chinese acupuncture. This article investigates the factors that influence the curative effect of acupuncture as to help set a standard for acupuncture studies in the future.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: Disponible Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) Asunto principal: Psicología / Factores de Tiempo / Puntos de Acupuntura / Terapia por Acupuntura / Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto / Medicina Tradicional China Tipo de estudio: Ensayo Clínico Controlado / Estudio diagnóstico Límite: Humanos Idioma: Inglés Revista: Chinese journal of integrative medicine Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Artículo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: Disponible Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) Asunto principal: Psicología / Factores de Tiempo / Puntos de Acupuntura / Terapia por Acupuntura / Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto / Medicina Tradicional China Tipo de estudio: Ensayo Clínico Controlado / Estudio diagnóstico Límite: Humanos Idioma: Inglés Revista: Chinese journal of integrative medicine Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Artículo