Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of piezosurgery and chisel osteotomy in the extraction of mandibular impacted third molars / 华西口腔医学杂志
West China Journal of Stomatology ; (6): 372-374, 2011.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-235041
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To study the effect of piezosurgery in the extraction of mandibular impacted third molars.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>228 mandibular impacted third molars with relative difficulty for extraction according to the scheme of degree of difficulty for extraction were included in the study, and were divided into two groups (114 teeth each group) Test group (treated by piezosurgery), control group (treated by traditional chisel osteotomy). The surgery time and pain, restriction of mouth opening and facial swelling after surgery, were evaluated in both groups.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The average surgery time was (16 +/- 5.2) min in test group and (30 +/- 8.7) min in control group. The surgery time, pain, facial swelling rate, and restriction of mouth opening were lower than control group (P<0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Compared with traditional chisel osteotomy, the average surgery time with piezosurgery was significantly shorter and the complications are obviously reduced.</p>
Asunto(s)
Texto completo: Disponible Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) Asunto principal: Osteotomía / Extracción Dental / Diente Impactado / Piezocirugía / Mandíbula / Tercer Molar Límite: Adulto / Femenino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Chino Revista: West China Journal of Stomatology Año: 2011 Tipo del documento: Artículo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: Disponible Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) Asunto principal: Osteotomía / Extracción Dental / Diente Impactado / Piezocirugía / Mandíbula / Tercer Molar Límite: Adulto / Femenino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Chino Revista: West China Journal of Stomatology Año: 2011 Tipo del documento: Artículo