Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Physiological Correlation of Airway Pressure and Transpulmonary Pressure Stress Index on Respiratory Mechanics in Acute Respiratory Failure / 中华医学杂志(英文版)
Chinese Medical Journal ; (24): 1652-1657, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | WPRIM | ID: wpr-251325
ABSTRACT
<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Stress index at post-recruitment maneuvers could be a method of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. However, airway pressure (Paw) stress index may not reflect lung mechanics in the patients with high chest wall elastance. This study was to evaluate the Pawstress index on lung mechanics and the correlation between Pawstress index and transpulmonary pressure (PL) stress index in acute respiratory failure (ARF) patients.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Twenty-four ARF patients with mechanical ventilation (MV) were consecutively recruited from July 2011 to April 2013 in Zhongda Hospital, Nanjing, China and Ospedale S. Giovanni Battista-Molinette Hospital, Turin, Italy. All patients underwent MV with volume control (tidal volume 6 ml/kg) for 20 min. PEEP was set according to the ARDSnet study protocol. The patients were divided into two groups according to the chest wall elastance/respiratory system elastance ratio. The high elastance group (H group, n = 14) had a ratio ≥30%, and the low elastance group (L group, n = 10) had a ratio <30%. Respiratory elastance, gas-exchange, Pawstress index, and PLstress index were measured. Student's t-test, regression analysis, and Bland-Altman analysis were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Pneumonia was the major cause of respiratory failure (71.0%). Compared with the L group, PEEP was lower in the H group (5.7 ± 1.7 cmH2O vs. 9.0 ± 2.3 cmH2O, P < 0.01). Compared with the H group, lung elastance was higher (20.0 ± 7.8 cmH2O/L vs. 11.6 ± 3.6 cmH2O/L, P < 0.01), and stress was higher in the L group (7.0 ± 1.9 vs. 4.9 ± 1.9, P = 0.02). A linear relationship was observed between the Pawstress index and the PLstress index in H group (R2 = 0.56, P < 0.01) and L group (R2 = 0.85, P < 0.01).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>In the ARF patients with MV, Pawstress index can substitute for PLto guide ventilator settings.</p><p><b>TRIAL REGISTRATION</b>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02196870 (https//clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02196870).</p>
Asunto(s)
Texto completo: Disponible Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) Asunto principal: Fisiología / Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria / Terapéutica / Mecánica Respiratoria / China / Volumen de Ventilación Pulmonar / Rendimiento Pulmonar / Análisis de Regresión / Respiración con Presión Positiva / Pulmón Tipo de estudio: Estudio diagnóstico / Guía de Práctica Clínica Límite: Adulto / Femenino / Humanos / Masculino País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: Inglés Revista: Chinese Medical Journal Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Artículo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: Disponible Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) Asunto principal: Fisiología / Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria / Terapéutica / Mecánica Respiratoria / China / Volumen de Ventilación Pulmonar / Rendimiento Pulmonar / Análisis de Regresión / Respiración con Presión Positiva / Pulmón Tipo de estudio: Estudio diagnóstico / Guía de Práctica Clínica Límite: Adulto / Femenino / Humanos / Masculino País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: Inglés Revista: Chinese Medical Journal Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Artículo