Effect of ventricular leads position on the clinic outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy / 中华医学杂志(英文版)
Chinese Medical Journal
;
(24): 3161-3164, 2013.
Artículo
en Inglés
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-263507
ABSTRACT
The RV lead position, either RVA or RVHS appears to make no difference in the response to CRT but the LV lead placement play a vital role.9,30 The latest activated regions of LV or areas without transmural myocardial scar for an optimal CRT are preferred. Currently, data demonstrate that no significant difference of clinical outcomes in posterior, anterior, and lateral LV lead position was found, while the ideal pacing site of the LV should be avoided in the apex position as suggested in COMPANION trial and MADIT-CRT trial. And dual-site LV CRT, which is a new technique, is also still in progress and we are looking forward to getting more updates from that.
Texto completo:
Disponible
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental)
Asunto principal:
Terapéutica
/
Resultado del Tratamiento
/
Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca
/
Dispositivos de Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca
/
Insuficiencia Cardíaca
/
Ventrículos Cardíacos
/
Hemodinámica
Límite:
Humanos
Idioma:
Inglés
Revista:
Chinese Medical Journal
Año:
2013
Tipo del documento:
Artículo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS